IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v40y1995i4p567-571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychosocial and medical factors in pregnancy outcomes: A case study of Israeli women

Author

Listed:
  • Hagoel, Lea
  • Van-Raalte, Riki
  • Kalekin-Fishman, Devorah
  • Shifroni, Galia
  • Epstein, Leon
  • Sorokin, Yoram

Abstract

Building on a body of research which confirms that psychosocial factors have an important influence on health in general and on pregnancy outcomes in particular, we carried out a prospective study of pregnant women in Israel. We hypothesized that medical pregnancy and delivery outcomes are mediated by psychosocial coping resources and risks. Resources were defined as social ties, and risks as life events self-reported as stressful. The population studied included 233 women who responded to questionnaires after the second trimester of pregnancy. Medical data on the delivery were collected from hospital archives. The questionnaire measured biomedical risks, including general medical and obstetrical history, as well as health behaviours, social ties, and perceived stress. Pregnancy outcomes were classified according to medical measures of abnormalities in mother and child at birth. Our findings show that resources such as the variety of social ties (family, friends, neighbours and colleagues) interacted significantly with biomedical risk. It was found that low scores for social ties anticipated 3.6 times higher negative medical outcome in otherwise healthy women than in those with higher scores for social ties. The findings of the study are discussed in terms of their implications for relating to social competence as a determining element in health and health behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Hagoel, Lea & Van-Raalte, Riki & Kalekin-Fishman, Devorah & Shifroni, Galia & Epstein, Leon & Sorokin, Yoram, 1995. "Psychosocial and medical factors in pregnancy outcomes: A case study of Israeli women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 567-571, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:567-571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)E0099-E
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:567-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.