IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v39y1994i5p733-741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-care and mastery among primary health care patients

Author

Listed:
  • Punamäki, Raija-Leena
  • Aschan, Hanna

Abstract

In this paper the content of everyday mastery is described, and related background variables are analyzed. Health maintenance, self-care practices, coping resources and feelings of helplessness, as indicators of daily mastery, were studied among a group of 142 Finnish primary care patients using a two-week diary method. The main themes related to health maintenance, self-care, and coping resources were found to be: meaningfulness of life, social relations and togetherness, activities, recreation and enjoyment, discipline and good health, and treatment of symptoms and diseases. The most frequent causes of feelings of helplessness were: diseases and symptoms, discrepancies between demands and capabilities, and negative psychological and emotional states. When writing about mastery, women mentioned philosophy and faith, social relations and togetherness, as well as food and dieting more often than men. Women recorded more helplessness due to discrepancies between demands and capabilities and to negative psychological and emotional states, whereas men recorded more helplessness due to global, political, and societal conditions. Older people recorded philosophy and faith and lay care more frequently as sources of mastery more than younger people. Helplessness due to the discrepancies between demands and capabilities was more evident among older people.

Suggested Citation

  • Punamäki, Raija-Leena & Aschan, Hanna, 1994. "Self-care and mastery among primary health care patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 733-741, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:5:p:733-741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90028-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:5:p:733-741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.