IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v37y1993i5p583-590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between the cost of community care and the dependency of old people

Author

Listed:
  • O'Shea, Eamon
  • Blackwell, John

Abstract

In this paper the relationship between resource use, costs and dependency is examined for a 'captured population' of old people living in the community but attending day hospital care. Dependency is measured using a Guttman (activities of daily living) based scale. Resource use is assigned by category of dependency and an opportunity cost methodology is used to estimate the cost of care. The results generally confirm that the overall cost of care increases with dependency, though there are exceptions to this trend when each component of care is analysed separately. For instance, not all elements of day hospital provision increase as dependency gets worse, as witnessed by the relatively low provision of paramedical care to old people in the highest category of dependency. The results also confirm that community care is not a cheap option. Once informal care is quantified and valued, the cost rises accordingly. Moreover, if persons living in the community are attending day hospital or have occasional in-patient stays in acute hospitals, costs will rise even more. This is not an argument against community care. Rather, it is to emphasize that while it may be better for some dependent old people to live at home it is not necessarily cheaper. This will come as no surprise to the many carers of old people whose work has rarely been satisfactorily taken into account in comparative analyses of the cost of care.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Shea, Eamon & Blackwell, John, 1993. "The relationship between the cost of community care and the dependency of old people," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 583-590, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:5:p:583-590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90097-N
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alain Paraponaris & Bérengère Davin & Pierre Verger, 2012. "Formal and informal care for disabled elderly living in the community: an appraisal of French care composition and costs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(3), pages 327-336, June.
    2. Bernard Berg & Werner Brouwer & Marc Koopmanschap, 2004. "Economic valuation of informal care," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 5(1), pages 36-45, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:5:p:583-590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.