IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v37y1993i12p1451-1459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physician uncertainty and the art of persuasion

Author

Listed:
  • Rizzo, John A.

Abstract

Incomplete information is a chronic feature of medical markets. Much attention has focused on information asymmetries between physicians and their patients. In contrast, physician uncertainty has received far less attention. This is a significant omission. Physician uncertainty may be an even more important reason than consumer uncertainty for the high cost of health care. This paper reviews and evaluates major approaches for managing physician uncertainty. We argue that quantitative approaches alone, such as scientific advancement and the application of decision analysis to clinical reasoning, are insufficient for dealing with uncertainty. Qualitative approaches, such as forging consensus through expert panels, and teaching physicians to accept and cope with uncertainty, will play a valuable role in promoting more effective clinical decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. The current tensions between those who would eradicate physician uncertainty through quantitative approaches and those who favor qualitative methods has parallels in many other fields, including economics and mathematics. These tensions are unfortunate, since the most promising initiative to promote better clinical decision-making will likely need to draw upon both approaches. The recent initiative to implement medical practice guidelines is one example of a broad-based approach to improve clinical decision-making. Guidelines draw upon available scientific evidence, but typically involve consensus-building as well. They seek to persuade and educate physicians about appropriate treatments, without mandating changes in physician treatment patterns.Given the persistent uncertainties physicians will undoubtedly confront regarding appropriate clinical decision-making, this flexible approach may be the best way to mitigate market failures resulting from inappropriate clinical decisions. Whatever initiatives are chosen, physicians must learn to live with uncertainty rather than live in hope of its eventual extinction.

Suggested Citation

  • Rizzo, John A., 1993. "Physician uncertainty and the art of persuasion," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 1451-1459, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:12:p:1451-1459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90179-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fujian Song & Alan Maynard, 1994. "Functional dyspepsia: a review of scientific and policy issues," Working Papers 119chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:12:p:1451-1459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.