IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v34y1992i6p697-707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HIV in the U.K.: Problems of prevalence, sociological response and health education

Author

Listed:
  • Winn, Sandra
  • Skelton, Robert

Abstract

It is argued that the prevalence of AIDS is substantially under-represented in existing national AIDS data. Thus although official statistics demonstrate significant recent shifts in transmission routes for HIV, health educators are faced with a problem because it is difficult to develop preventive strategies against a syndrome whose prevalence can only be estimated. Problems of the true extent of the prevalence of HIV are compounded when there is a lack of knowledge about the specifics of heterosexual behaviour. It is unwise to assume that the protective strategies developed by gay men in the face of HIV are routinely available for adoption by heterosexuals, who are characterised by social divisions of age, gender and relative amounts of social power. These concerns represent a problem for health educators. To date, sociological work may not have made the most effective contribution in its support of intervention strategies against HIV/AIDS. Examination of the empirical literature on lay concepts of health and illness reveals a pessimistic stance on the part of some researchers about the ability of individuals to modify behaviour. More positive readings of their own data are possible. The traditional concerns to emphasise the socio-economic determinants of health and behaviour, now also shared by some health educators, should not obscure a concern for the fate of individuals. The most effective contribution that health promotion may be able to make to the control of HIV in the heterosexual population is to assist in the development of strategies of empowerment and 'horizontal intervention'.

Suggested Citation

  • Winn, Sandra & Skelton, Robert, 1992. "HIV in the U.K.: Problems of prevalence, sociological response and health education," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 697-707, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:34:y:1992:i:6:p:697-707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90197-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:34:y:1992:i:6:p:697-707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.