IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i4p517-524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disablement and the ideological crisis in health care

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Gareth H.

Abstract

Disablement from chronic illness presents medicine with a constant reminder of the limits to its therapeutic effectiveness, and challenges the political legitimacy of Welfare States. In this regard, chronic illness forms a crucial component of the 'crisis' in health care. In this paper I look at the different ways in which disablement stimulates this crisis--for medicine, for political economy, and for disabled people themselves. In looking at responses to the crisis I detect a certain reluctance, or inability, to move away from an atomistic perspective which underpins much of our thinking on health and social policy, and much else besides. I conclude by arguing, against post-modern cynics, that a reasoned defence of the Welfare State requires a broader concept of self-sufficiency and a perspective which both acknowledges the need for help, and recognizes the extent to which the provision of help may further disempower the disadvantaged.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Gareth H., 1991. "Disablement and the ideological crisis in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 517-524, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:4:p:517-524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90355-G
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:4:p:517-524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.