IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v31y1990i9p997-1000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do attitudes predict uptake of smoking in teenagers? Case not proven

Author

Listed:
  • Jarvis, Martin J.
  • Goddard, Eileen
  • McNeill, Ann

Abstract

A recent paper by Charlton and Blair (Soc. Sci. Med. 29, 813-818, 1989) reported a large prospective study on smoking in 12 and 13 year-old schoolchildren. The main new findings were that attitudes, particularly among girls, were important predictors of the uptake of smoking in never-smokers. The present paper presents a critique of this study and argues that the findings may not reflect true predictive relationships. Data are presented from OPCS-conducted national surveys which indicate that a substantial minority of children who initially classify themselves as never-smokers admit to having tried a cigarette when prompted. These undisclosed triers differ from confirmed never-smokers on relevant predictor variables, and are significantly more likely to agree that they will try a cigarette again before leaving school (12% vs 4% P

Suggested Citation

  • Jarvis, Martin J. & Goddard, Eileen & McNeill, Ann, 1990. "Do attitudes predict uptake of smoking in teenagers? Case not proven," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 31(9), pages 997-1000, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:9:p:997-1000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90109-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    smoking teenagers attitudes;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:9:p:997-1000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.