IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v30y1990i12p1313-1318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Change and continuity in patient theories of illness: The case of epilepsy

Author

Listed:
  • Kirchgässler, K. U.

Abstract

Lay concepts of health and illness have attracted much interest in medical sociology. Empirical research has shown that lay theories present coherent views of health and illness which are often not compatible with medical concepts, but influenced by them. Nevertheless, knowledge on the nature of medical influence on individual patient theories over time is scarce. This paper explores this issue by empirically analysing the illness theories of patients with epilepsy. In this qualitative study, the classification and description of illness theories is attempted through ideal types which describe theoretically significant properties of patient discourse. Data from a 4-year follow-up are compared with the original classification. While the continiuties in patient theories seem to be primarily due to continuities in the illness careers, the changes in the direction of psychosomatic theories seen in some patients favour the view that patient theories have dynamic structures which are heavily influenced also on the individual level by historical developments in clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirchgässler, K. U., 1990. "Change and continuity in patient theories of illness: The case of epilepsy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 1313-1318, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:30:y:1990:i:12:p:1313-1318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90311-F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:30:y:1990:i:12:p:1313-1318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.