IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v28y1989i4p315-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction of information during the initial medical visit: Consequences for patient follow-through with physician recommendations for medication

Author

Listed:
  • Rost, Kathryn
  • Carter, William
  • Inui, Thomas

Abstract

While negotiation of treatment decisions in the medical visit has long been recognized as an important interviewing skill, limited work has been done to investigate how doctors and patients negotiate what information is relevant in understanding the patient's problem. In this research we tested how the introduction of information reflecting both the patient's and physician's perspective is related to the patient's adherence to physician recommendations for medication. Introduction of information was defined as bi-directional if patients independently offered information of behavior as frequently as they provided the information or exhibited behavior that physicians requested. Thirty random samples of audiotaped dialogue were used to construct estimates of introduction of information during the history, examination, and consultation phases of initial ambulatory care visits of 45 older male patients. The data demonstrate that bi-directional introduction of information during the examination segment explains more than half of the variance in patient adherence to physician recommendations for new medication. These findings support the idea that physician willingness to allow patients to contribute input may contribute to the partnership's arrival at treatment decisions that have meaning for both.

Suggested Citation

  • Rost, Kathryn & Carter, William & Inui, Thomas, 1989. "Introduction of information during the initial medical visit: Consequences for patient follow-through with physician recommendations for medication," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 315-321, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:4:p:315-321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90032-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Budych, Karolina & Helms, Thomas M. & Schultz, Carsten, 2012. "How do patients with rare diseases experience the medical encounter? Exploring role behavior and its impact on patient–physician interaction," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 154-164.
    2. Richard L. Street JR & Becky Voigt, 1997. "Patient Participation in Deciding Breast Cancer Treatment and Subsequent Quality of Life," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(3), pages 298-306, July.
    3. Peep F. M. Stalmeier, 2011. "Adherence and Decision Aids," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(1), pages 121-129, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:4:p:315-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.