IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v28y1989i1p37-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defensive work in nursing homes: Accountability gone amok

Author

Listed:
  • Wiener, Carolyn L.
  • Kayser-Jones, Jeanie

Abstract

This paper contrasts conditions in intensive care nurseries and skilled nursing facilities in order to bring out certain features of organizational functioning in nursing homes. Data stem from a study of three American nursing homes which focused on the circumstances influencing decision-making in the evaluation and treatment of acute illness. Defensive work--work that is institution-protective and/or self-protective--emerged as a dominant process. It is demonstrated that the avoidance strategies which constitute defensive work lead to a progression of counterstrategies and foster skewed priorities. Consequences are: an acceptance of substandard care and a diversion of attention from therapeutic work. The relationship of defensive work to the larger question of how the nation handles its sick elderly is examined in the conclusion of the paper. Recommendations are offered for organizational steps that would re-channel the wasted energy that is spent on defensive work toward more productive therapeutic work.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiener, Carolyn L. & Kayser-Jones, Jeanie, 1989. "Defensive work in nursing homes: Accountability gone amok," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 37-44, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:1:p:37-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90304-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:1:p:37-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.