IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v26y1988i6p587-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models of mystery: Physician and patient perceptions of sudden infant death syndrome

Author

Listed:
  • Wright, Anne L.

Abstract

Sudden infant death syndrome or SIDS is the term applied to unexplained infant deaths. This syndrome is distinguished by a lack of knowledge about its cause, pathophysiology, and possibilities for prevention. Given these uncertainties, SIDS provides an opportunity to investigate what types of explanatory models are constructed by physicians and patients when relatively little is known about a condition, and how these models may be translated into clinical practice. Interviews about SIDS were conducted with members of a Pediatric Pulmonary Section and their high risk patients, and the clinical interactions between the staff and families were observed. The pulmonary model focused on physiological causes which might affect respiration, and reflected uncertainty in both content and variability. Parents largely accepted the respiratory hypothesis, although they also considered nonphysiological causes. They tended to manage the uncertainty by focusing on ways to prevent SIDS and by believing they could predict which babies might die. However, observations of clinical interactions revealed that very little of the uncertainty as perceived by either the staff or the parents was discussed. The staff is able to emphasize hope for a particular patient, despite the uncertainty that surrounds SIDS, by following an explicit protocol which states how to handle a child despite the theoretical unknowns, and focusing on the knowns about the particular baby's condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Wright, Anne L., 1988. "Models of mystery: Physician and patient perceptions of sudden infant death syndrome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 587-595, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:6:p:587-595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90022-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:6:p:587-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.