IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v26y1988i1p37-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatising residential care for elderly people: The geography of developments in Devon, England

Author

Listed:
  • Phillips, D.R.
  • Vincent, J.

Abstract

The growth in numbers of very elderly people is becoming a trend in many Western societies. Often, these people may come to require some kind of assisted living environment. In Britain during the 1980s the overwhelming growth of residential accommodation has been in the private rather than the public sector. This has links with a number of other trends in health care and other sectors of the economy which are moving towards privatisation. The reasons for this are discussed and a case study of the county of Devon introduced. A survey of about one-quarter of all 450 homes in the county in mid-1984 revealed that they had important characteristics as small business. Countywide, a marked concentration of private residential homes has developed in some coastal 'holiday' locations. However, there have recently been changes in this pattern and growth of numbers of homes in some main towns also. There have been certain adverse reactions to the growth of homes and in a few areas, planning authorities have attempted to prevent the development of local concentrations of homes. This has been related to other policies elsewhere to prevent the concentration and ghettoisation of service-dependent groups. The nature and results of such planning policies are briefly considered. The paper addresses the overall questions of the type of care we wish to provide for our elderly people and whether privatisation of this aspect of health and welfare services is justified. This poses an important area of research for medical geographers interested in service delivery and aspects of equity in health care provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillips, D.R. & Vincent, J., 1988. "Privatising residential care for elderly people: The geography of developments in Devon, England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 37-47, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:1:p:37-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90043-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:1:p:37-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.