IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v26y1988i11p1133-1139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communities, self-causation and the natural lottery

Author

Listed:
  • Loewy, Erich H.

Abstract

This paper examines the various notions of community, and of the 'natural lottery' as well as investigating the role that 'self-causation' plays in communal obligations. In examining community, two opposing views are juxtaposed: (1) the view that community consists merely of persons united by duties of refraining from harm one to another, resulting in autonomy based justice which makes freedom an absolute condition of morality; and (2) a broader view which sees the concept of community as entailing obligations of beneficence, resulting in beneficence based justice and which, therefore, sees freedom as a value to be cautiously traded with other values. In examining the 'natural lottery' in the light of community, the various consequences of viewing the lottery in various ways and the impact that our view of community has on these consequences, is explored. A third option, the option that the 'natural lottery' as the cause of illness and health is a shaky concept, is offered. Self-causation of illness and its linkage to concepts of community and of the 'natural lottery' is then briefly examined. It is concluded that (1) community implies a social contract which, in order to be conceived in the first place, necessitates more than a minimalist ethic: to come about, a degree of beneficence inspiring trust is presupposed; (2) conceiving community narrowly is neither what we ordinarily do when we think of the term nor, for that matter, workable in our world; (3) thinking of the 'natural lottery' as the main determinant of health or disease can be shown to be false: in our world, disease is, to a large degree at least, a social construct; and (4) blaming self-causation for many of today's illnesses has superficial merit but causation is far too complex to permit such a simplistic notion practical application (except, perhaps, that substances known to cause excess harm might be taxed and the tax used for health purposes). The paper concludes by affirming that obligations of care for the welfare of all members of the community (regardless of their contribution to their own misfortune), far more than duties of simply refraining from harm one to another, enables communities to survive.

Suggested Citation

  • Loewy, Erich H., 1988. "Communities, self-causation and the natural lottery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(11), pages 1133-1139, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:11:p:1133-1139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90189-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:11:p:1133-1139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.