IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v25y1987i4p377-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural dimensions of hot, cold and sema in Sinhalese health culture

Author

Listed:
  • Nichter, Mark

Abstract

Attention is focused on those for whom hot/cold and phlegm constitute special health concerns in Sri Lanka. A distinction is drawn between those at special risk to hot/cold and phlegm based on a sense of constitutional vulnerability and those at risk due to temporary illness or expected changes in physiological process. Socialization of the former risk group is considered in light of social labeling theory, while the health behavior of the latter group is highlighted. It is pointed out that a wide range of behavior from folk dietetics to bathing and from water boiling to the taking of birth control pills is influenced by hot/cold reasoning. It is emphasized that the hot/cold conceptual framework serves an integrative function in the traditional health care arena and provides a rationale for participatory action in a health culture undergoing rapid medicalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Nichter, Mark, 1987. "Cultural dimensions of hot, cold and sema in Sinhalese health culture," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 377-387, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:4:p:377-387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90276-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Craig, Sienna R. & Adams, Lisa V. & Spielberg, Stephen P. & Campbell, Benjamin, 2009. "Pediatric therapeutics and medicine administration in resource-poor settings: A review of barriers and an agenda for interdisciplinary approaches to improving outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 1681-1690, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:4:p:377-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.