IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v23y1986i3p293-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privacy protection and population-based health research

Author

Listed:
  • Lako, C. J.

Abstract

In this article we discuss obstacles of privacy protection measures to population-based health research and we give suggestions for policies facilitating this research as well as protecting the privacy of the patient. Privacy is the capacity of the individual to determine which information is communicated to whom. Population-based health research is research among human populations and refers to health services research, medical sociology, epidemiology, occupational health, social dentistry, family medicine a.o. Although population-based health research focuses on groups and not on individuals, the access to health and other vital records and the possibility to identify the individuals for subsequent interview and study are of crucial importance. In various countries the legislation regarding privacy protection requires that medical records should not be disclosed unless with the consent of the individual. Therefore it forms a major obstacle to population-based health research as this research is very difficult to carry out if prior consent is required in order for the investigator to have access to medical records. Population-based health research has given us important knowledge about the etiology of many diseases and the effect of interventions. In the case of population-based health research disclosure of patient information without the explicit patient consent should be seriously considered. This disclosure should only be permitted if an institutional board has studied the project plans of the investigators and has carefully watched the privacy aspects of their studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lako, C. J., 1986. "Privacy protection and population-based health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 293-295, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:3:p:293-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90350-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petrini, Carlo, 2010. ""Broad" consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 217-220, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:3:p:293-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.