IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v23y1986i10p945-961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mental disorders and ecological structure in Nottingham

Author

Listed:
  • Giggs, John A.

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a specifically geographical investigation of the incidence, distribution and social/environmental correlates of mental disorder in Nottingham. Three diagnostic groups were examined, namely schizophrenia and paranoia, the effective psychoses (or manic depression) and the non-psychotic mental disorders. Analysis of two distinct cohorts of first contact patients for both the schizophrenia and affective psychoses diagnoses yielded markedly dissimilar incidence rates. It is therefore suggested that observed variations in the incidence of specific mental disorders between cities probably reflect such nosocomial (i.e. service related) factors as diagnostic accuracy and the levels of local psychiatric services. It is therefore dangerous to ascribe the variations solely to the contrasting social/environmental milieux found in these cities. The spatial distributions of the selected mental disorders within Nottingham were analysed in the context of a set of 12 distinct ecological areas. These areas were derived from a matrix comprising 105 sub-areas and 40 variables via principal components analysis and a non-hierarchical clustering algorithm. Marked spatial variation in the incidence of all the mental disorders was demonstrated via both traditional mapping and probability mapping techniques. Pearson product-moment analysis revealed that the distributions of the two diagnostically distinct schizophrenia and affective psychoses cohorts were virtually identical. The relationships between the inception rates for the mental disorders and social/environmental attributes were analysed. Stepwise multiple regression models for both the principal components and the individual census variables revealed strong and systematic relationships with all the mental disorders. Although such ecological analysis has limited explanatory power it nevertheless provides useful insights into mental disorder-environmental relationships. It is argued that these can be subsequently best examined at a disaggregated (i.e. behavioural) level.

Suggested Citation

  • Giggs, John A., 1986. "Mental disorders and ecological structure in Nottingham," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 23(10), pages 945-961, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:10:p:945-961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90252-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goldsmith, Harold F. & Holzer, Charles E. & Manderscheid, Ronald W., 1998. "Neighborhood characteristics and mental illness," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 211-225, May.
    2. Tello, Juan Eduardo & Jones, Julia & Bonizzato, Paola & Mazzi, Mariangela & Amaddeo, Francesco & Tansella, Michele, 2005. "A census-based socio-economic status (SES) index as a tool to examine the relationship between mental health services use and deprivation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(10), pages 2096-2105, November.
    3. Cromley, Ellen K. & Wilson-Genderson, Maureen & Pruchno, Rachel A., 2012. "Neighborhood characteristics and depressive symptoms of older people: Local spatial analyses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(12), pages 2307-2316.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:10:p:945-961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.