IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i3p199-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is unnecessary surgery? Who shall decide? Issues of consumer sovereignty, conflict and self-regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Schacht, Paul J.
  • Pemberton, Alec

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study of selected surgical procedures in Queensland, Australia. The data are compared to trends in the U.S.A. and England and Wales. Attention is drawn to the limitations of such epidemiological data as the basis for inferences about the necessity (or otherwise) of particular operations. This leads to a discussion of unnecessary surgery in the light of arguments for and against consumer sovereignty and the self-regulation of the medical profession. Faced with differences of opinion, and the problems of reconciling expert and consumer views about necessity, we argue that claims and counter-claims about unnecessary surgery should be opened to closer scrutiny. A review committee format based on medical and non-medical participation is proposed to achieve this end.

Suggested Citation

  • Schacht, Paul J. & Pemberton, Alec, 1985. "What is unnecessary surgery? Who shall decide? Issues of consumer sovereignty, conflict and self-regulation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 199-206, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:3:p:199-206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90232-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:3:p:199-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.