IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i10p1041-1048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The political economy of the NHS: Individualist justifications of collective action

Author

Listed:
  • Dowie, Jack

Abstract

The paper outlines some of the main ways in which economists have argued a system of collective health care can be justified from a broadly individualistic position. It sets out the value judgments and technical conditions which generate the conclusion that competitive markets maximise welfare and then considers the reasons why these conditions may not apply in the health are (imperfections in supply, uncertainty, externalities). Particular attention is given to the arguments which rest on altruistic 'caring preferences'. Various sources of non-market (collective) failure are then identified, as countervailing argument.

Suggested Citation

  • Dowie, Jack, 1985. "The political economy of the NHS: Individualist justifications of collective action," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(10), pages 1041-1048, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:10:p:1041-1048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90261-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:10:p:1041-1048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.