IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i9p917-927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Death from non-war violence: An international comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Day, Lincoln H.

Abstract

Patterns of death from violence (accidents, suicide and homicide) among persons 1-64 years of age during the approximate period 1950-1978 were studied in 49 populations having 'virtually complete' registration of death. On both theoretical and methodological grounds, the main part of the analysis was based on the sum of death rates from all violent causes, rather than on the rates for these various causes, separately. Substancial differences were found both within populations according to gender and age, and between populations with respect to: the extent of death from violence, the proportion such deaths were of all deaths and the ratio of male to female mortality from this cause. Also found was a high degree of consistency over time, both between a population's mortality level from violence and the rank order of this mortality level in comparison with that of other populations. No particular association was found between the death rate from violence and that from other causes. Explanation is seen as involving a variety of possible causes: physiology, chance, the availability of means, role differences, social disorganization and the 'culture of violence', all of which are in some measure supported by the patterns observed. While considerably lessened by the method used, some problems of interpretation do remain, particularly with respect to cross-population comparisons. These several problems are enumerated and briefly discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Day, Lincoln H., 1984. "Death from non-war violence: An international comparison," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(9), pages 917-927, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:9:p:917-927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90321-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:9:p:917-927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.