IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i6p595-601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intervention in work-related disability: The need for an integrated approach

Author

Listed:
  • Greenwood, Judith G.

Abstract

This paper looks at work-related disability in the United States as it is currently addressed according to the policies and procedures of the Social Security Disability Administration and the Workers' Compensation system. These policies and procedures proceed from a medical model that emphasizes health impairment as the fundamental cause of work-related disability. Thus physicians' evaluations of work-related impairment are the primary basis for administrative disability determinations. Increasing litigation regarding disability determinations and experience with long-term work-related disability suggest that the guiding policies are flawed. Work-related disability is as much a problem of manpower policy as it is one of personal health, but most employers and compensation programs in the United States do not yet respond to it as such. Recommended is a shift from a medical to a socioeconomic frame of reference for work-related disability that would overtly recognize regional variations in the static and dynamic factors of the economy and that would promote return to work and rehabilitation. Political intervention will be necessary. Because cultural values and social relationships are part of the problem, new research is needed in correlates of work-related disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Greenwood, Judith G., 1984. "Intervention in work-related disability: The need for an integrated approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 595-601, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:6:p:595-601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90225-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:6:p:595-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.