IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v116y2014icp82-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contribution of streetscape audits to explanation of physical activity in four age groups based on the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS)

Author

Listed:
  • Cain, Kelli L.
  • Millstein, Rachel A.
  • Sallis, James F.
  • Conway, Terry L.
  • Gavand, Kavita A.
  • Frank, Lawrence D.
  • Saelens, Brian E.
  • Geremia, Carrie M.
  • Chapman, James
  • Adams, Marc A.
  • Glanz, Karen
  • King, Abby C.

Abstract

Ecological models of physical activity emphasize the effects of environmental influences. “Microscale” streetscape features that may affect pedestrian experience have received less research attention than macroscale walkability (e.g., residential density). The Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) measures street design, transit stops, sidewalk qualities, street crossing amenities, and features impacting aesthetics. The present study examined associations of microscale attributes with multiple physical activity (PA) measures across four age groups. Areas in the San Diego, Seattle, and the Baltimore metropolitan areas, USA, were selected that varied on macro-level walkability and neighborhood income. Participants (n = 3677) represented four age groups (children, adolescents, adults, older adults). MAPS audits were conducted along a 0.25 mile route along the street network from participant residences toward the nearest non-residential destination. MAPS data were collected in 2009–2010. Subscale and overall summary scores were created. Walking/biking for transportation and leisure/neighborhood PA were measured with age-appropriate surveys. Objective PA was measured with accelerometers. Mixed linear regression analyses were adjusted for macro-level walkability. Across all age groups 51.2%, 22.1%, and 15.7% of all MAPS scores were significantly associated with walking/biking for transport, leisure/neighborhood PA, and objectively-measured PA, respectively. Supporting the ecological model principle of behavioral specificity, destinations and land use, streetscape, street segment, and intersection variables were more related to transport walking/biking, while aesthetic variables were related to leisure/neighborhood PA. The overall score was related to objective PA in children and older adults. Present findings provide strong evidence that microscale environment attributes are related to PA across the lifespan. Improving microscale features may be a feasible approach to creating activity-friendly environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Cain, Kelli L. & Millstein, Rachel A. & Sallis, James F. & Conway, Terry L. & Gavand, Kavita A. & Frank, Lawrence D. & Saelens, Brian E. & Geremia, Carrie M. & Chapman, James & Adams, Marc A. & Glanz,, 2014. "Contribution of streetscape audits to explanation of physical activity in four age groups based on the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 82-92.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:116:y:2014:i:c:p:82-92
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614004109
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Abby C. & Sallis, James F. & Frank, Lawrence D. & Saelens, Brian E. & Cain, Kelli & Conway, Terry L. & Chapman, James E. & Ahn, David K. & Kerr, Jacqueline, 2011. "Aging in neighborhoods differing in walkability and income: Associations with physical activity and obesity in older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(10), pages 1525-1533.
    2. Brownson, R.C. & Chang, J.J. & Eyler, A.A. & Ainsworth, B.E. & Kirtland, K.A. & Saelens, B.E. & Sallis, J.F., 2004. "Measuring the Environment for Friendliness Toward Physical Activity: A Comparison of the Reliability of 3 Questionnaires," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(3), pages 473-483.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yafeng Zou & Qi Wang & Min Deng & Yujie Wang, 2021. "Community Intervention System: COVID-19 Control in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Delso, Javier & Martín, Belén & Ortega, Emilio, 2018. "A new procedure using network analysis and kernel density estimations to evaluate the effect of urban configurations on pedestrian mobility. The case study of Vitoria –Gasteiz," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 61-72.
    3. Razieh Zandieh & Johannes Flacke & Javier Martinez & Phil Jones & Martin Van Maarseveen, 2017. "Do Inequalities in Neighborhood Walkability Drive Disparities in Older Adults’ Outdoor Walking?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Ye Sun & Wei Lu & Peijin Sun, 2021. "Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening—A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Tessa Pocock & Antoni Moore & Javier Molina-García & Ana Queralt & Sandra Mandic, 2020. "School Neighbourhood Built Environment Assessment for Adolescents’ Active Transport to School: Modification of an Environmental Audit Tool and Protocol (MAPS Global-SN)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Lingchao Meng & Chun Zhu & Kuo-Hsun Wen, 2020. "Research on Constructing a Healing Environment for the Street Spaces of a High-Density City: Using Street Spaces in Macao’s Old City Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Aghaabbasi, Mahdi & Moeinaddini, Mehdi & Shah, Muahammad Zaly & Asadi-Shekari, Zohreh, 2018. "Addressing issues in the use of Google tools for assessing pedestrian built environments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-198.
    8. Hou, Yuting & Yap, Winston & Chua, Rochelle & Song, Siqi & Yuen, Belinda, 2020. "The associations between older adults’ daily travel pattern and objective and perceived built environment: A study of three neighbourhoods in Singapore," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 314-328.
    9. Alexandra Klann & Linh Vu & Mollie Ewing & Mark Fenton & Rachele Pojednic, 2019. "Translating Urban Walkability Initiatives for Older Adults in Rural and Under-Resourced Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Hoerster, Katherine D. & Millstein, Rachel A. & Hall, Katherine S. & Gray, Kristen E. & Reiber, Gayle E. & Nelson, Karin M. & Saelens, Brian E., 2015. "Individual and contextual correlates of physical activity among a clinical sample of United States Veterans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 100-108.
    11. Marc A. Adams & Christine B. Phillips & Akshar Patel & Ariane Middel, 2022. "Training Computers to See the Built Environment Related to Physical Activity: Detection of Microscale Walkability Features Using Computer Vision," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros & Bakogiannis, Efthimios & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2023. "Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Eunju Hwang & Nancy Brossoie & Jin Wook Jeong & Kimin Song, 2021. "The Impacts of the Neighborhood Built Environment on Social Capital for Middle-Aged and Elderly Koreans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Roei Yosifof & Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman, 2024. "Hybrid quantitative mesoscale analyses for simulating pedestrians’ visual perceptions: Comparison of three New York City streets," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(1), pages 140-156, January.
    15. Adewale L. Oyeyemi & Sanda M. Kolo & Adamu A. Rufai & Adetoyeje Y. Oyeyemi & Babatunji A. Omotara & James F. Sallis, 2019. "Associations of Neighborhood Walkability with Sedentary Time in Nigerian Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Carlson, Jordan A. & Shook, Robin P. & Davis, Ann M. & Papa, Amy & Steel, Chelsea & Bejarano, Carolina & Noel-MacDonnell, Janelle R. & Summar, Shelly & Dean, Kelsey & Hampl, Sarah E., 2021. "Investigating associations between physical activity-related neighborhood built environment features and child weight status to inform local practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    17. Joel Adu-Brimpong & Nathan Coffey & Colby Ayers & David Berrigan & Leah R. Yingling & Samantha Thomas & Valerie Mitchell & Chaarushi Ahuja & Joshua Rivers & Jacob Hartz & Tiffany M. Powell-Wiley, 2017. "Optimizing Scoring and Sampling Methods for Assessing Built Neighborhood Environment Quality in Residential Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, March.
    18. Dadi An & Yan Liu & Yihua Huang, 2023. "The Influence of Street Components on Age Diversity: A Case Study on a Living Street in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Ottoni, Callista A. & Sims-Gould, Joanie & Winters, Meghan & Heijnen, Myrthe & McKay, Heather A., 2016. "“Benches become like porches”: Built and social environment influences on older adults’ experiences of mobility and well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 33-41.
    20. Adriana Ortegon-Sanchez & Rosemary R. C. McEachan & Alexandra Albert & Chris Cartwright & Nicola Christie & Ashley Dhanani & Shahid Islam & Marcella Ucci & Laura Vaughan, 2021. "Measuring the Built Environment in Studies of Child Health—A Meta-Narrative Review of Associations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-34, October.
    21. Kim, Ji-Il & Yu, Chia-Yuan & Woo, Ayoung, 2023. "The impacts of visual street environments on obesity: The mediating role of walking behaviors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    22. Deanna M. Hoelscher & Leigh Ann Ganzar & Deborah Salvo & Harold W. Kohl & Adriana Pérez & Henry Shelton Brown & Sarah S. Bentley & Erin E. Dooley & Amir Emamian & Casey P. Durand, 2022. "Effects of Large-Scale Municipal Safe Routes to School Infrastructure on Student Active Travel and Physical Activity: Design, Methods, and Baseline Data of the Safe Travel Environment Evaluation in Te," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, February.
    23. Melody Smith & Suzanne Mavoa & Erika Ikeda & Kamyar Hasanzadeh & Jinfeng Zhao & Tiina E. Rinne & Niamh Donnellan & Marketta Kyttä & Jianqiang Cui, 2022. "Associations between Children’s Physical Activity and Neighborhood Environments Using GIS: A Secondary Analysis from a Systematic Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mi Namgung & B. Elizabeth Mercado Gonzalez & Seungwoo Park, 2019. "The Role of Built Environment on Health of Older Adults in Korea: Obesity and Gender Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Jayeun Kim & Kyuhyun Yoon, 2020. "Municipal Residence Level of Long-Term PM 10 Exposure Associated with Obesity among Young Adults in Seoul, Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Marquet, Oriol & Miralles-Guasch, Carme, 2015. "Neighbourhood vitality and physical activity among the elderly: The role of walkable environments on active ageing in Barcelona, Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 24-30.
    4. Alba Martínez-García & Eva María Trescastro-López & María Eugenia Galiana-Sánchez & Pamela Pereyra-Zamora, 2019. "Data Collection Instruments for Obesogenic Environments in Adults: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Dan Andersson & Lina Wahlgren & Karin Sofia Elisabeth Olsson & Peter Schantz, 2023. "Pedestrians’ Perceptions of Motorized Traffic Variables in Relation to Appraisals of Urban Route Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Dagmar Sigmundová & Walid El Ansari & Erik Sigmund, 2011. "Neighbourhood Environment Correlates of Physical Activity: A Study of Eight Czech Regional Towns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Kelly, Cheryl M. & Hoehner, Christine M. & Baker, Elizabeth A. & Brennan Ramirez, Laura K. & Brownson, Ross C., 2006. "Promoting physical activity in communities: Approaches for successful evaluation of programs and policies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 280-292, August.
    8. Michael, Yvonne L. & Nagel, Corey L. & Gold, Rachel & Hillier, Teresa A., 2014. "Does change in the neighborhood environment prevent obesity in older women?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 129-137.
    9. Wood, Lisa & Giles-Corti, Billie & Bulsara, Max, 2005. "The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1159-1173, September.
    10. Andrews, Gavin J. & Hall, Edward & Evans, Bethan & Colls, Rachel, 2012. "Moving beyond walkability: On the potential of health geography," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(11), pages 1925-1932.
    11. Ottoni, Callista A. & Sims-Gould, Joanie & Winters, Meghan & Heijnen, Myrthe & McKay, Heather A., 2016. "“Benches become like porches”: Built and social environment influences on older adults’ experiences of mobility and well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 33-41.
    12. Nicoleta Cutumisu & John C. Spence, 2012. "Sport Fields as Potential Catalysts for Physical Activity in the Neighbourhood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Shiwang Yu & Na Guo & Caimiao Zheng & Yu Song & Jianli Hao, 2021. "Investigating the Association between Outdoor Environment and Outdoor Activities for Seniors Living in Old Residential Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Van Cauwenberg, Jelle & De Donder, Liesbeth & Clarys, Peter & De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse & Buffel, Tine & De Witte, Nico & Dury, Sarah & Verté, Dominique & Deforche, Benedicte, 2014. "Relationships between the perceived neighborhood social environment and walking for transportation among older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 23-30.
    15. Schmidt, Swantje C. & Sleddens, Ester F.C. & de Vries, Sanne I. & Gubbels, Jessica & Thijs, Carel, 2015. "Longitudinal association of neighborhood variables with Body Mass Index in Dutch school-age children: The KOALA Birth Cohort Study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 99-108.
    16. Yeh, Anthony Gar-On & Zhong, Teng, 2021. "Polygonization method for automatic generation of indoor and outdoor pedestrian navigation path for smart city," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Schaefer-McDaniel, Nicole & O'Brien Caughy, Margaret & O'Campo, Patricia & Gearey, Wayne, 2010. "Examining methodological details of neighbourhood observations and the relationship to health: A literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 277-292, January.
    18. Aghaabbasi, Mahdi & Moeinaddini, Mehdi & Shah, Muahammad Zaly & Asadi-Shekari, Zohreh, 2018. "Addressing issues in the use of Google tools for assessing pedestrian built environments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-198.
    19. Hong, Andy & Sallis, James F. & King, Abby C. & Conway, Terry L. & Saelens, Brian & Cain, Kelli L. & Fox, Eric H. & Frank, Lawrence D., 2018. "Linking green space to neighborhood social capital in older adults: The role of perceived safety," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 38-45.
    20. Francesco Scorza & Giovanni Fortunato & Raffaella Carbone & Beniamino Murgante & Piergiuseppe Pontrandolfi, 2021. "Increasing Urban Walkability through Citizens’ Participation Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:116:y:2014:i:c:p:82-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.