IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v23y2007i3p251-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views

Author

Listed:
  • Hernes, Tor
  • Weik, Elke

Abstract

This paper offers a classification of process views in organization studies. We start by assuming that distinctions may be drawn between ways that stability of entities is conceptualized in organizational analysis. From this point of departure we explore four different process views, namely: process as flows, process as programmes, process as recursive reproduction and process as connectivity. The first two views--process as flows and process as programmes--tend to build on the assumption that processes take place within relatively stable contexts, such as the organization or the institutional environment. This we refer to as an "exogenous" view. A second type of views of process is what we refer to as "endogenous" views, which are based on the assumption that stabilization of entities resides in the process itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Hernes, Tor & Weik, Elke, 2007. "Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 251-264, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:23:y:2007:i:3:p:251-264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522107000504
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Korin, Heidi & Seeck, Hannele & Liikamaa, Kirsi, 2023. "Reflecting on the past—a key to facilitating learning in strategy practice?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118464, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Steffen Roth & Augusto Sales & Jari Kaivo-oja, 2017. "Multiplying the Division of Labour: Functional Differentiation of the Next Key Variables in Management Research," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 195-207, March.
    3. Griesbach, David & Grand, Simon, 2013. "Managing as transcending: An ethnography," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 63-77.
    4. Serghei Floricel & Sorin Piperca & Richard Tee, 2018. "Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, May.
    5. Vesa, Mikko & Franck, Henrika, 2013. "Bringing strategy to time, studying strategy as experiential vectors," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 23-34.
    6. Drakopoulou Dodd, Sarah & Anderson, Alistair & Jack, Sarah, 2013. "Being in time and the family owned firm," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 35-47.
    7. Patriotta, Gerardo & Spedale, Simona, 2011. "Micro-interaction dynamics in group decision making: Face games, interaction order and boundary work," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 362-374.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:23:y:2007:i:3:p:251-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.