IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v42y2013i1p87-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental innovation and the role of stakeholder collaboration in West Coast port gateways

Author

Listed:
  • Hall, Peter V.
  • O'Brien, Thomas
  • Woudsma, Clarence

Abstract

The paper explores the role of stakeholder collaboration in the adoption of innovations as part of the environmental and sustainability agenda of port gateways. We do this through a comparative assessment of the port of Vancouver, British Columbia, and the twin ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California. An inductive research approach is used to identify and assess the initiation and implementation process behind exemplary innovations. Innovation includes new technologies and processes for handling and moving cargo, mechanisms for planning and policy making, as well as financing, implementing, upgrading, managing and operating infrastructure systems. A relatively new arena for competition on the basis of innovation concerns environmental performance. The conceptual framework and empirical evidence suggest that while there may be intense demand for and supply of innovation in port gateways, the complex dynamics of the logistics chain are such that successful innovation requires conscious involvement and collaboration of stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Hall, Peter V. & O'Brien, Thomas & Woudsma, Clarence, 2013. "Environmental innovation and the role of stakeholder collaboration in West Coast port gateways," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 87-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:42:y:2013:i:1:p:87-96
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.11.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885912001655
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.11.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Hall & Wouter Jacobs, 2010. "Shifting Proximities: The Maritime Ports Sector in an Era of Global Supply Chains," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1103-1115.
    2. Anders Malmberg & Peter Maskell, 2006. "Localized Learning Revisited," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), 2012. "Creative Knowledge Cities," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14402.
    4. Genevieve Giuliano & Thomas O’Brien, 2008. "Extended gate operations at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach: a preliminary assessment," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 215-235, April.
    5. Duane Windsor, 2010. "The Role of Dynamics in Stakeholder Thinking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 79-87, August.
    6. Ingmar Björkman & Wilhelm Barner-Rasmussen & Li Li, 2004. "Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: the impact of headquarters control mechanisms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 35(5), pages 443-455, September.
    7. Nicholas Dew & Saras Sarasvathy, 2007. "Innovations, Stakeholders & Entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 267-283, September.
    8. Wouter Jacobs, 2007. "PORT COMPETITION BETWEEN LOS ANGELES and LONG BEACH: AN INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(3), pages 360-372, July.
    9. Martijn R Van Der Horst & Peter W De Langen, 2008. "Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 108-129, March.
    10. Ross Robinson, 2002. "Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 241-255.
    11. Bart Nooteboom, 2000. "Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 69-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1368-1375, December.
    2. Witte, Patrick & Slack, Brian & Keesman, Maarten & Jugie, Jeanne-Hélène & Wiegmans, Bart, 2018. "Facilitating start-ups in port-city innovation ecosystems: A case study of Montreal and Rotterdam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 224-234.
    3. Sofia Agostinelli & Mehdi Neshat & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Giuseppe Piras & Davide Astiaso Garcia, 2022. "Integrating Renewable Energy Sources in Italian Port Areas towards Renewable Energy Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Marcello Risitano & Francesco Parola & Alessandra Turi & Marco Ferretti, 2017. "Green practices in port authority management: A multiple case study," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 127-145.
    5. Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepulveda & Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia & Jonathan Sanhueza-Vergara, 2021. "How to Measure Environmental Performance in Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Bjerkan, Kristin Ystmark & Ryghaug, Marianne, 2021. "Diverging pathways to port sustainability: How social processes shape and direct transition work," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    7. Marcella De Martino, 2015. "L?innovazione collaborativa nei porti: aspetti metodologici ed alcune evidenze empiriche," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 105-126.
    8. Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "The adaptive capacity of container ports in an era of mega vessels: The case of upstream seaports Antwerp and Hamburg," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 295-309.
    9. Irina Svaetichin & Tommi Inkinen, 2017. "Port Waste Management in the Baltic Sea Area: A Four Port Study on the Legal Requirements, Processes and Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Federico Martín Bermúdez & Fernando González Laxe & Eva Aguayo-Lorenzo, 2020. "Port sustainability in Spain: the case of noise," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 8061-8078, December.
    11. Theo Notteboom & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2018. "The Greening of Terminal Concessions in Seaports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Jonas Mendes Constante & Peter W. Langen & Salvador Furió Pruñonosa, 2023. "Innovation ecosystems in ports: a comparative analysis of Rotterdam and Valencia," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Ducruet, César & Jacobs, Wouter & Monios, Jason & Notteboom, Theo & Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Slack, Brian & Tam, Ka-chai & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2014. "Port geography at the crossroads with human geography: between flows and spaces," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 84-96.
    2. Wouter Jacobs & Theo Notteboom, 2011. "An Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Port Systems: The Role of Windows of Opportunity in Shaping Seaport Competition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(7), pages 1674-1692, July.
    3. Notteboom, Theo & De Langen, Peter & Jacobs, Wouter, 2013. "Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 26-35.
    4. R. B. Castelein & H. Geerlings & J. H. R. Van Duin, 2019. "The ostensible tension between competition and cooperation in ports: a case study on intra-port competition and inter-organizational relations in the Rotterdam container handling sector," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2012. "Giving a direction to port regionalisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1551-1561.
    6. Jacobsson, Stefan & Arnäs, Per Olof & Stefansson, Gunnar, 2018. "Differentiation of access management services at seaport terminals: Facilitating potential improvements for road hauliers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 256-264.
    7. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    8. van Asperen, E. & Dekker, R., 2010. "Flexibility in Port Selection: A Quantitative Approach Using Floating Stocks," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Monios, Jason & Lambert, Bruce, 2013. "The Heartland Intermodal Corridor: public private partnerships and the transformation of institutional settings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 36-45.
    10. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    11. Debrie, Jean & Lavaud-Letilleul, Valérie & Parola, Francesco, 2013. "Shaping port governance: the territorial trajectories of reform," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 56-65.
    12. Jili Xu & Fiona Fan Yang & Desheng Xue, 2019. "The Geography of Knowledge Sourcing, Personal Networks, and Innovation Effects: Evidence from the Biomedical Firms in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Debrie, Jean & Fremont, Antoine & Gouvernal, Elisabeth, 2010. "Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 519-529.
    14. Antoine Frémont & Pierre Franc, 2008. "VOIES NAVIGABLES ET DESSERTE PORTUAIRE Massifier les flux pour intégrer le transport fluvial dans les chaînes logistiques portuaires : étude des impacts économiques et environnementaux. Le cas du tran," Post-Print hal-00544625, HAL.
    15. Frémont, Antoine & Franc, Pierre, 2010. "Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 548-556.
    16. Frank Schiller & Alexandra Penn & Angela Druckman & Lauren Basson & Kate Royston, 2014. "Exploring Space, Exploiting Opportunities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(6), pages 792-798, December.
    17. Marcella De Martino, 2021. "Value Creation for Sustainability in Port: Perspectives of Analysis and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    18. De Noni, Ivan & Ganzaroli, Andrea & Orsi, Luigi, 2017. "The impact of intra- and inter-regional knowledge collaboration and technological variety on the knowledge productivity of European regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 108-118.
    19. Jiang Wei & Minfei Zhou & Mark Greeven & Hongyan Qu, 2016. "Economic governance, dual networks and innovative learning in five Chinese industrial clusters," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1037-1074, December.
    20. Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "The adaptive capacity of container ports in an era of mega vessels: The case of upstream seaports Antwerp and Hamburg," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 295-309.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gateways; Logistics chains; Seaport; Stakeholders; Environmental innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L9 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:42:y:2013:i:1:p:87-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.