This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Goldfarb, Brent
Henrekson, Magnus

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V77-45G00XD-3/2/a8d3b4ac1d65e145a7cca6a8ef75226f
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Research Policy.

Volume (Year): 32 (2003)
Issue (Month): 4 (April)
Pages: 639-658
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:32:y:2003:i:4:p:639-658

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Heidi Boesdal).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Francesco Lissoni & Patrick Llerena & Maureen McKelvey & Bulat Sanditov, 2008. "Academic Patenting in Europe: New Evidence from the KEINS Database," Working Papers of BETA 2008-16, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, ULP, Strasbourg. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Maria das Dores B. Moura Oliveira & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2009. "Policy approaches regarding technology transfer: Portugal and Switzerland compared," FEP Working Papers 334, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto. [Downloadable!]
  3. Gavin Cameron & Chris Wallace, 2003. "Technology Clubs: Efficient Pricing in Business-University Collaborations," Economics Series Working Papers 157, University of Oxford, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  4. Landström, Hans & Gabrielsson, Jonas & Brunsnes, Thomas, 2006. "A Knowledge-based Categorization of Research-based Spin-off Creation," CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper Series 2006-06, CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy), Lund University. [Downloadable!]
  5. N. Moray & B. Clarysse, 2004. "Institutional Change and the Resource Flows going to Spin off Projects: The case of IMEC," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/241, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Ejermo, Olof, 2004. "Productivity Spillovers of R&D in Sweden," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 15, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies. [Downloadable!]
  7. De Cleyn S. & Braet J., 2007. "Research valorisation through spin-off ventures: Integration of existing concepts and typologies," Working Papers 2007008, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics. [Downloadable!]
  8. Djordje Djokovic & Vangelis Souitaris, 2008. "Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 225-247, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Ejermo, Olof & Kander, Astrid & Svensson Henning, Martin, 2008. "The Swedish Paradox arises in Fast-Growing Sectors," CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper Series 2008-07, CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy), Lund University. [Downloadable!]
  10. Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Metla, Chandra Mohan Reddy, 2008. "Research Faculty, Entrepreneurship and Commercialization: The Case of Kansas State University," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6741, Southern Agricultural Economics Association. [Downloadable!]
  11. Zoltan Bajmocy, 2006. "Opportunities of University Business Incubation in the Less Favoured Regions of Transition Countries," ERSA conference papers ersa06p190, European Regional Science Association. [Downloadable!]
  12. De Cleyn S. & Braet J., 2006. "The evolution and performance of spin-off ventures: integration and elaboration of existing models," Working Papers 2006031, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics. [Downloadable!]
  13. Junbo, Y. & Stough, R.R. & Nijkamp, P., 2008. "Governing Technological Entrepreneurship in China and the West," Serie Research Memoranda 0019, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics. [Downloadable!]
  14. Kander, Astrid & Ejermo, Olof, 2006. "The Swedish Paradox," CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper Series 2006-01, CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy), Lund University. [Downloadable!]
  15. Jonathan Levie & Erkko Autio, 2008. "A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 235-263, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About five million pdf files are downloaded through RePEc every year.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-7.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.