A cost-benefit analysis of moose harvesting in Scandinavia. A stage structured modelling approach
AbstractA cost-benefit analysis of moose (Alces alces) harvesting in Scandinavia is presented within the framework of an age structured model with four categories of animals (calves, yearlings, adult females, and adult males). The paper aims to demonstrate the economic content of such a wildlife model and how this content may change under shifting economic and ecological conditions. Two different harvesting regimes are explored: landowner profit maximization, where the combined benefit of harvesting value and browsing damage is taken into account, and overall management, where the costs and damages of moose-vehicle collisions are taken into account as well. An empirical analysis of the Norwegian moose stock indicates that the present stock level is far too high compared with the overall management scenario, and that the composition of the harvest could be improved.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Resource and Energy Economics.
Volume (Year): 33 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 (September)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505569
Moose hunting Cost-benefit analysis Stage model;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Abul Maala Tanvir Hussain & John Tschirhart, 2010. "Optimal Harvest Licensing When Harvest Success Is Uncertain," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(1), pages 125-140.
- Tahvonen, Olli, 2009. "Economics of harvesting age-structured fish populations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 281-299, November.
- Anders Skonhoft & Jon Olaf Olaussen, 2005.
"Managing a Migratory Species That Is Both a Value and a Pest,"
University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 81(1).
- Jon Olaf Olaussen & Anders Skonhoft, 2004. "Managing a Migratory Species that is both a Value and Pest," Working Paper Series 3904, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
- Naevdal, Eric & Olaussen, Jon Olaf & Skonhoft, Anders, 2012. "A bioeconomic model of trophy hunting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 194-205.
- Wam, Hilde Karine & Hofstad, Ole, 2007. "Taking timber browsing damage into account: A density dependant matrix model for the optimal harvest of moose in Scandinavia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 45-55, April.
- Göran Ericsson & Mattias Boman & Leif Mattsson, 2000. "Selective versus Random Moose Harvesting: Does it Pay to be a Prudent Predator?," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 117-132, May.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.