IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v135y2012i2p899-906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A profit assessment model for equipment inspection and replacement under renewing free replacement warranty policy

Author

Listed:
  • Darghouth, M.N.
  • Chelbi, Anis
  • Ait-kadi, Daoud

Abstract

For many types of equipment whose maintenance requires skilled labor or whose random failure may have serious consequences, such as aircraft engines, medical equipment and others, customers generally prefer to entrust maintenance activities to the manufacturer or any of its representatives. The latter must, in turn, provide the customer with a maintenance program that is economically viable for both parties. In this study, the customer and the manufacturer agree on what follows regarding a non-self-announcing failure equipment whose state is only known through inspection: during the warranty period, the manufacturer inspects the equipment according to a specified schedule which he establishes taking into account that the costs incurred for inspections and replacements are supported by him during the warranty period. After the expiration of the warranty, inspections and replacements are performed by the manufacturer and billed to the customer. Moreover, penalties related to inactivity periods between failures and their detection are always supported by the manufacturer. The warranty is applicable to any equipment replaced during the validity period of the service contract. This type of contract generates a profit for the manufacturer. In this paper, an analytical model taking into account the commitments of both parties has been developed. The model allows generating the instants (x1, x2,…, xn) at which the inspections must be performed and the corresponding expected profit for the manufacturer while considering the warranty period offered on the market for similar equipment. An algorithm has also been developed to generate the inspection instants given the costs structure and the lifetime probability distribution of the equipment. In a context where business models argue for a greater implication of suppliers towards their customers, the proposed decision model may be relevant and very useful.

Suggested Citation

  • Darghouth, M.N. & Chelbi, Anis & Ait-kadi, Daoud, 2012. "A profit assessment model for equipment inspection and replacement under renewing free replacement warranty policy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 899-906.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:135:y:2012:i:2:p:899-906
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.10.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527311004592
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.10.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Wenbin, 2010. "A model for maintenance service contract design, negotiation and optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 239-246, February.
    2. Jackson, Canek & Pascual, Rodrigo, 2008. "Optimal maintenance service contract negotiation with aging equipment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 387-398, September.
    3. Cui, L. R. & Loh, H. T. & Xie, M., 2004. "Sequential inspection strategy for multiple systems under availability requirement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 170-177, May.
    4. Murthy, D. N. P. & Asgharizadeh, E., 1999. "Optimal decision making in a maintenance service operation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 259-273, July.
    5. Blischke, W. R. & Murthy, D. N. P., 1992. "Product warranty management -- I: A taxonomy for warranty policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 127-148, October.
    6. Murthy, D. N. P. & Djamaludin, I., 2002. "New product warranty: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 231-260, October.
    7. N. Wattanapanom & L. Shaw, 1979. "Optimal Inspection Schedules for Failure Detection in a Model Where Tests Hasten Failures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 303-317, April.
    8. Joseph B. Keller, 1974. "Optimum Checking Schedules for Systems Subject to Random Failure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 256-260, November.
    9. Chelbi, Anis & Ait-Kadi, Daoud, 2000. "Generalized inspection strategy for randomly failing systems subjected to random shocks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 379-384, March.
    10. Zuo, Ming J. & Liu, Bin & Murthy, D. N. P., 2000. "Replacement-repair policy for multi-state deteriorating products under warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 519-530, June.
    11. Yeh, Ruey Huei & Chen, Ming-Yuh & Lin, Chen-Yi, 2007. "Optimal periodic replacement policy for repairable products under free-repair warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1678-1686, February.
    12. Leung, Francis Kit-nam, 2001. "Inspection schedules when the lifetime distribution of a single-unit system is completely unknown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 106-115, July.
    13. Giri, B.C. & Dohi, T., 2007. "Inspection scheduling for imperfect production processes under free repair warranty contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 238-252, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darghouth, M.N. & Ait-kadi, D. & Chelbi, A., 2017. "Joint optimization of design, warranty and price for products sold with maintenance service contracts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 197-208.
    2. Tong Peng & Liu Chunling, 2020. "Designing differential service strategy for two-dimensional warranty based on warranty claim data under consumer-side modularisation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 550-561, June.
    3. Mohamed Noomane Darghouth & Anis Chelbi & Daoud Ait-kadi, 2017. "Investigating reliability improvement of second-hand production equipment considering warranty and preventive maintenance strategies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4643-4661, August.
    4. Sarkar, Biswajit & Saren, Sharmila, 2016. "Product inspection policy for an imperfect production system with inspection errors and warranty cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 263-271.
    5. Nan Zhang & Mitra Fouladirad & Anne Barros, 2018. "Warranty analysis of a two-component system with type I stochastic dependence," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(3), pages 274-283, June.
    6. Liu, Bin & Wu, Jun & Xie, Min, 2015. "Cost analysis for multi-component system with failure interaction under renewing free-replacement warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 874-882.
    7. Zhu, Qinghua & Li, Helong & Zhao, Senlin & Lun, Venus, 2016. "Redesign of service modes for remanufactured products and its financial benefits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 231-240.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darghouth, M.N. & Ait-kadi, D. & Chelbi, A., 2017. "Joint optimization of design, warranty and price for products sold with maintenance service contracts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 197-208.
    2. Shafiee, Mahmood & Chukova, Stefanka, 2013. "Maintenance models in warranty: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 561-572.
    3. Esmaeili, M. & Shamsi Gamchi, N. & Asgharizadeh, E., 2014. "Three-level warranty service contract among manufacturer, agent and customer: A game-theoretical approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 177-186.
    4. Huber, Sebastian & Spinler, Stefan, 2012. "Pricing of full-service repair contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 113-121.
    5. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2016. "On information-based warranty policy for repairable products from heterogeneous populationAuthor-Name: Lee, Hyunju," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 204-215.
    6. Yi Ding & Anatoly Lisnianski & Ilia Frenkel & Lev Khvatskin, 2009. "Optimal corrective maintenance contract planning for aging multi‐state system," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 612-631, September.
    7. Jackson, Canek & Pascual, Rodrigo & Mac Cawley, Alejandro & Godoy, Sergio, 2023. "Product–service system negotiation in aircraft lease contracts with option of disagreement," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Marc Reimann & Weihua Zhang, 2013. "Joint optimization of new production, warranty servicing strategy and secondary market supply under consumer returns," Working Paper Series, Social and Economic Sciences 2013-03, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz.
    9. Mohamed Noomane Darghouth & Anis Chelbi & Daoud Ait-kadi, 2017. "Investigating reliability improvement of second-hand production equipment considering warranty and preventive maintenance strategies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4643-4661, August.
    10. Miguel Cruz, Antonio & Maria Rios Rincon, Adriana, 2012. "Medical device maintenance outsourcing: Have operation management research and management theories forgotten the medical engineering community? A mapping review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 186-197.
    11. Rahimi-Ghahroodi, S. & Al Hanbali, A. & Zijm, W.H.M. & Timmer, J.B., 2019. "Emergency supply contracts for a service provider with limited local resources," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 445-460.
    12. Zheng, Rui & Zhou, Yifan, 2021. "Comparison of three preventive maintenance warranty policies for products deteriorating with age and a time-varying covariate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Hezarkhani, Behzad, 2017. "Optimal design of uptime-guarantee contracts under IGFR valuations and convex costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 556-566.
    14. Wang, Wenbin, 2010. "A model for maintenance service contract design, negotiation and optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 239-246, February.
    15. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Santana, João Mateus & Droguett, Enrique López & Lins, Isis Didier & Guedes, Bruno Nunes, 2017. "Analysis of extended warranties for medical equipment: A Stackelberg game model using priority queues," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 338-354.
    16. Luo, Ming & Wu, Shaomin, 2019. "A comprehensive analysis of warranty claims and optimal policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 144-159.
    17. Rodrigo Pascual & Matías Siña & Gabriel Santelices & Milton Román & Enrique López Droguett, 2017. "Optimal channel coordination in use-based product-service system contracts," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 6946-6956, December.
    18. Liu, Yiliu & Liu, Zixian & Wang, Yukun, 2013. "Customized warranty offering for configurable products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-7.
    19. Michele Compare & Francesco Di Maio & Enrico Zio & Fausto Carlevaro & Sara Mattafirri, 2016. "Improving scheduled maintenance by missing data reconstruction: A double-loop Monte Carlo approach," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(5), pages 502-511, October.
    20. Leung, Francis Kit-nam, 2001. "Inspection schedules when the lifetime distribution of a single-unit system is completely unknown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 106-115, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:135:y:2012:i:2:p:899-906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.