IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v122y2009i1p319-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic supply chain modeling using a new fuzzy hybrid negotiation mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Jain, Vipul
  • Deshmukh, S.G.

Abstract

The key part of dynamic supply chain management is negotiating with suppliers and with buyers. Coordination is essential for successful supply chain management. In order to model coordination among suppliers and buyers in a dynamic supply chain, this paper takes a step further and proposes a new fuzzy- logic-based hybrid negotiation mechanism. In most real-world negotiation situations, agents have a common interest to cooperate, but have conflicting interests over exactly how to cooperate. These situations involve restrictions and preferences that may be vaguely and partly defined. Therefore, this study takes the advantage of fuzzy logic and develops a hybrid negotiation-based mechanism, that combines both cooperative and competitive negotiations. Achieving effective coordination in a multi-agent system is non-trivial as no agent possesses the global view of the problem space. Moreover, the different strategies adopted by agents may produce conflicts. While agents coordinate with each other in the operations, they will negotiate about their strategies to reduce conflicts. The proposed fuzzy hybrid negotiation mechanism allows negotiation agents more flexibility and robustness in an automated negotiation system. The proposed mechanism not only helps sellers and buyers to explore various new choices and opportunities that the e-markets offer but also allows them to identify and analyze their resource constraints in a given schedule, and helps them to explore and exploit many alternatives for a better solution. The efficacy of the proposed approach is demonstrated through an illustrative example.

Suggested Citation

  • Jain, Vipul & Deshmukh, S.G., 2009. "Dynamic supply chain modeling using a new fuzzy hybrid negotiation mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 319-328, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:122:y:2009:i:1:p:319-328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(09)00196-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vipul Jain & S. Wadhwa & S.G. Deshmukh, 2006. "Modelling and analysis of supply chain dynamics: a High Intelligent Time (HIT) petri net based approach," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 59-86.
    2. Frayret, Jean-Marc & D&rsquo & Amours, Sophie & Montreuil, Benoit & Cloutier, Louis, 2001. "A network approach to operate agile manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-3), pages 239-259, December.
    3. Petrovic, Dobrila & Roy, Rajat & Petrovic, Radivoj, 1999. "Supply chain modelling using fuzzy sets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 443-453, March.
    4. Vipul Jain & S. Wadhwa & S. G. Deshmukh, 2007. "A Negotiation-to-Coordinate (N2C) Mechanism for Modeling Buyer-Supplier Relationship in Dynamic Environment," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, April.
    5. D'Amours, Sophie & Montreuil, Benoit & Lefrancois, Pierre & Soumis, Francois, 1999. "Networked manufacturing:: The impact of information sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 63-79, January.
    6. Reaidy, Jihad & Massotte, Pierre & Diep, Daniel, 2006. "Comparison of negotiation protocols in dynamic agent-based manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1-2), pages 117-130, February.
    7. N.R. Jennings & P. Faratin & A.R. Lomuscio & S. Parsons & M.J. Wooldridge & C. Sierra, 2001. "Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 199-215, March.
    8. Yoo, Sang Bong & Kim, Yeongho, 2002. "Web-based knowledge management for sharing product data in virtual enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1-2), pages 173-183, January.
    9. Lo, Wei-Shuo & Hong, Tzung-Pei & Jeng, Rong, 2008. "A framework of E-SCM multi-agent systems in the fashion industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 594-614, August.
    10. Yunzeng Wang & Yigal Gerchak, 2001. "Supply Chain Coordination when Demand Is Shelf-Space Dependent," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 82-87, August.
    11. Terry A. Taylor, 2001. "Channel Coordination Under Price Protection, Midlife Returns, and End-of-Life Returns in Dynamic Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(9), pages 1220-1234, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mejía, Gonzalo & García-Díaz, César, 2018. "Market-level effects of firm-level adaptation and intermediation in networked markets of fresh foods: A case study in Colombia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 132-142.
    2. Gajanan Panchal & Vipul Jain & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Matthias Gurtner, 2017. "Equilibrium analysis in multi-echelon supply chain with multi-dimensional utilities of inertial players," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 417-436, August.
    3. Ge, Houtian & Gray, Richard & Nolan, James, 2015. "Agricultural supply chain optimization and complexity: A comparison of analytic vs simulated solutions and policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 208-220.
    4. Azadegan, Arash & Porobic, Lejla & Ghazinoory, Sepehr & Samouei, Parvaneh & Saman Kheirkhah, Amir, 2011. "Fuzzy logic in manufacturing: A review of literature and a specialized application," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 258-270, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Chin-Yuan & Fan, Pei-Shu & Chang, Pei-Chann, 2010. "A system dynamics modeling approach for a military weapon maintenance supply system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 457-469, December.
    2. Jorge E. Hernández & Josefa Mula & Raúl Poler & Andrew C. Lyons, 2014. "Collaborative Planning in Multi-tier Supply Chains Supported by a Negotiation-Based Mechanism and Multi-agent System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 235-269, March.
    3. Lee, Chang Hwan & Rhee, Byong-Duk, 2007. "Channel coordination using product returns for a supply chain with stochastic salvage capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 214-238, February.
    4. Chun-Chin Wei & Liang-Tu Chen, 2021. "Supply Chain Replenishment Decision for Newsvendor Products with Multiple Periods and a Short Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Lo, Wei-Shuo & Hong, Tzung-Pei & Jeng, Rong, 2008. "A framework of E-SCM multi-agent systems in the fashion industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 594-614, August.
    6. Jinsoo Park & Hamirahanim Abdul Rahman & Jihae Suh & Hazami Hussin, 2019. "A Study of Integrative Bargaining Model with Argumentation-Based Negotiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Themistocleous, Marinos & Irani, Zahir & Love, Peter E. D., 2004. "Evaluating the integration of supply chain information systems: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 393-405, December.
    8. Preil, Deniz & Krapp, Michael, 2022. "Bandit-based inventory optimisation: Reinforcement learning in multi-echelon supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    9. Hong Joo Lee & Hyung Jun Ahn & Jong Woo Kim & Sung Joo Park, 2006. "Capturing and reusing knowledge in engineering change management: A case of automobile development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 8(5), pages 375-394, December.
    10. David C. Parkes & Jayant Kalagnanam, 2005. "Models for Iterative Multiattribute Procurement Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 435-451, March.
    11. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Shokr, Iman & Konstantaras, Ioannis & VafaeiNejad, Mahyar, 2020. "Stock replenishment policies for a vendor-managed inventory in a retailing system," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    12. Wu, Zhengping & Zhai, Xin & Liu, Zhongyi, 2015. "The inventory billboard effect on the lead-time decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 45-53.
    13. Juan M. Alberola & Vicent Botti & Jose M. Such, 2014. "Advances in infrastructures and tools for multiagent systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 163-167, April.
    14. Melvin F. Shakun, 2005. "Multi-bilateral Multi-issue E-negotiation in E-commerce with a Tit-for-Tat Computer Agent," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 383-392, September.
    15. İsmail Bakal & Nesim Erkip & Refik Güllü, 2011. "Value of supplier’s capacity information in a two-echelon supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 115-135, November.
    16. Arvind Shroff & Bhavin J. Shah & Hasmukh Gajjar, 2021. "Shelf space allocation game with private brands: a profit-sharing perspective," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 116-133, April.
    17. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Min, Jie & Goyal, Suresh K., 2008. "Supply-chain coordination under an inventory-level-dependent demand rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 518-527, June.
    18. Michael Krapp & Johannes B. Kraus, 2019. "Coordination contracts for reverse supply chains: a state-of-the-art review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(7), pages 747-792, September.
    19. Ryu, Kwangyeol & Yücesan, Enver, 2010. "A fuzzy newsvendor approach to supply chain coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 421-438, January.
    20. Goyal, Suresh Kumar & Chang, Chun-Tao, 2009. "Optimal ordering and transfer policy for an inventory with stock dependent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 177-185, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:122:y:2009:i:1:p:319-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.