IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v118y2009i1p208-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A proposal for inventory adjustment using "multiple-layers SEC-CIS model"

Author

Listed:
  • Sumita, Tomofumi
  • Shimazaki, Masahito
  • Matsuyama, Keisuke

Abstract

What constitutes a desirable inventory level in supply chain management (SCM) depends on the business model. While the level is being maintained, unexpected situations sometimes occur. The organization that manages the level must focus on adjusting the level to protect against such risks. The "multiple-layers SEC-CIS model" is useful as a framework to promote such a focus by enhancing understanding of the mechanism by which opinions of related players can be adjusted. Therefore, this study proposes that the "multiple-layers SEC-CIS model" is useful for inventory adjustment. A desirable inventory level in a given business model corresponds to "a plan", and maintaining that inventory level corresponds to "the execution". At the stage of execution, the inventory level will be adjusted according to changes in quantity, quality, price or the date that the materials are procured or the products are ordered. If such changes fluctuate within the assumptions of the model, the inventory control system can cope with them based on the mathematical model. However, inventory adjustment based on the mathematical model is difficult when unexpected rapid change occurs. The framework is necessary for organizations to analyze existing information and new conditions, and to make decisions on how to cope with such risk. For those purposes, we have proposed the "multiple-layers SEC-CIS model", which explains how knowledge value is cultivated based on communication between organizations. Prior to our model, the "SECI model" was proposed by Nonaka and Takeuchi [1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, Oxford]. They regarded knowledge creation in an organization as a process of change from tacit knowledge to explicit knowledge. They described the four modes of knowledge creation: "S" (socialization), "E" (externalization), "C" (combination) and "I" (internalization). The well-known "SECI model" is named after this process. We got suggestions from the "SECI model" to develop our model: each organization goes through the cycle of "C-I-S-E-C", the cycle of "interpretation-thinking-transmission". In other words, information obtained from outside the organization is interpreted and becomes the basis of the next behavior. When two or more organizations share each mode, namely "S", "E", "C" and "I", knowledge can be shared between those organizations. Particularly, the knowledge which is most likely to be shared is explicit knowledge (information). We based our analysis on the assumption that the knowledge that can be gained from outside of the organization (player/layer) is always explicit knowledge, and that which can be introduced to other organization (player/layer) is only explicit knowledge. We then developed "SEC-CIS model", and explicit knowledge (information) were connected with another organization (layer) at the mode "C". Thus we have reached "multiple-layers SEC-CIS model", which were expressed three-dimensionally. Using a case, we illustrate the usefulness of the "multiple-layers SEC-CIS model" to describe communications between layers about inventory-level setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumita, Tomofumi & Shimazaki, Masahito & Matsuyama, Keisuke, 2009. "A proposal for inventory adjustment using "multiple-layers SEC-CIS model"," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 208-216, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:118:y:2009:i:1:p:208-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(08)00266-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:118:y:2009:i:1:p:208-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.