IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v403y2014icp284-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive consideration of strategy updating promotes cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ya
  • Lan, Xin
  • Deng, Xinyang
  • Sadiq, Rehan
  • Deng, Yong

Abstract

We investigate how the cooperation emerges in the square lattice when individuals play the prisoner’s dilemma game by adopting different strategy updating methods. First, we classify individuals in two classes at the strategy updating stage: stochastic players and smart players. The stochastic players are those who take the classical Fermi rule, while the smart players are those who make comprehensive evaluation for strategy updating. Second, we adopt Dempster–Shafer theory to combine smart players’ evaluations from payoff and environment aspects. Simulation results reveal that the comprehensive strategy updating method has a positive impact on the emergence of cooperation. Furthermore, the number of cooperators increases with the proportion of smart player increase. However, it is noteworthy that defector never become extinct, even all players in the network are smart ones. This is because some smart players would maximize their payoff if they choose to betray their cooperative neighbors. Our work in this paper may provide further understanding of the origin of cooperation in social and biology systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ya & Lan, Xin & Deng, Xinyang & Sadiq, Rehan & Deng, Yong, 2014. "Comprehensive consideration of strategy updating promotes cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 403(C), pages 284-292.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:403:y:2014:i:c:p:284-292
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.02.051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437114001605
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2014.02.051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Zhihu & Li, Zhi & Wu, Te & Wang, Long, 2014. "Effects of payoff-related velocity in the co-evolutionary snowdrift game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 304-311.
    2. D. Peng & H.-X. Yang & W.-X. Wang & G. R. Chen & B.-H. Wang, 2010. "Promotion of cooperation induced by nonuniform payoff allocation in spatial public goods game," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 73(3), pages 455-459, February.
    3. Chen, Xiaojie & Fu, Feng & Wang, Long, 2008. "Promoting cooperation by local contribution under stochastic win-stay-lose-shift mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(22), pages 5609-5615.
    4. Wang, Xiaofeng & Chen, Xiaojie & Gao, Jia & Wang, Long, 2013. "Reputation-based mutual selection rule promotes cooperation in spatial threshold public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 181-187.
    5. Wei, Daijun & Deng, Xinyang & Zhang, Xiaoge & Deng, Yong & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2013. "Identifying influential nodes in weighted networks based on evidence theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(10), pages 2564-2575.
    6. Liu, Yongkui & Zhang, Lin & Chen, Xiaojie & Ren, Lei & Wang, Long, 2013. "Cautious strategy update promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(17), pages 3640-3647.
    7. Szolnoki, Attila & Perc, Matjaž & Danku, Zsuzsa, 2008. "Towards effective payoffs in the prisoner’s dilemma game on scale-free networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(8), pages 2075-2082.
    8. Liu, Xu-Sheng & Guan, Jian-Yue & Wu, Zhi-Xi, 2013. "Effects of limited interactions between individuals on cooperation in spatial evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 106-112.
    9. Gracia-Lázaro, Carlos & Floría, Luis M. & Gómez-Gardeñes, Jesús & Moreno, Yamir, 2013. "Cooperation in changing environments: Irreversibility in the transition to cooperation in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 188-193.
    10. Beynon, Malcolm & Curry, Bruce & Morgan, Peter, 2000. "The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 37-50, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Yifan & Shu, Gang & Li, Ya, 2017. "Strategy-updating depending on local environment enhances cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 224-232.
    2. Xin, C. & Yang, G. & Huang, J.P., 2017. "Ising game: Nonequilibrium steady states of resource-allocation systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 666-673.
    3. Wu, Yu’e & Zhang, Zhipeng & Wang, Xinyu & Yan, Ming & Zhang, Qingfeng & Zhang, Shuhua, 2021. "Evolution of cooperation in the multigame on a two-layer square network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 400(C).
    4. Quan, Ji & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Information fusion based on reputation and payoff promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    5. Quan, Ji & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Evidential reasoning based on imitation and aspiration information in strategy learning promotes cooperation in optional spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Deng, Xinyang & Zhang, Zhipeng & Deng, Yong & Liu, Qi & Chang, Shuhua, 2016. "Self-adaptive win-stay-lose-shift reference selection mechanism promotes cooperation on a square lattice," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 284(C), pages 322-331.
    7. Li, Ya & Chen, Shanxiong & Niu, Ben, 2018. "Reward depending on public funds stimulates cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 38-45.
    8. Pu, Jia & Jia, Tao & Li, Ya, 2019. "Effects of time cost on the evolution of cooperation in snowdrift game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 146-151.
    9. Wu, Jie & Wang, Xiuling & Chen, Jinjin & Shu, Gang & Li, Ya, 2015. "The position of a door can significantly impact on pedestrians’ evacuation time in an emergency," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 29-35.
    10. Amnon Rapoport & Darryl A Seale & Andrew M Colman, 2015. "Is Tit-for-Tat the Answer? On the Conclusions Drawn from Axelrod's Tournaments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia, Ke, 2021. "The characteristics of average abundance function of multi-player threshold public goods evolutionary game model under redistribution mechanism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    2. Quan, Ji & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Information fusion based on reputation and payoff promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    3. Zheng, Lei & Li, Youqi & Zhou, Jingsai & Li, Yumeng, 2022. "The effect of celebrity on the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    4. Su, Qi & Li, Aming & Wang, Long, 2017. "Spatial structure favors cooperative behavior in the snowdrift game with multiple interactive dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 299-306.
    5. Liu, Yongkui & Chen, Xiaojie & Zhang, Lin & Tao, Fei & Wang, Long, 2012. "Does migration cost influence cooperation among success-driven individuals?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(11), pages 1301-1308.
    6. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Imitating winner or sympathizing loser? Quadratic effects on cooperative behavior in prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 327-337.
    7. Quan, Ji & Yang, Xiukang & Wang, Xianjia, 2018. "Spatial public goods game with continuous contributions based on Particle Swarm Optimization learning and the evolution of cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 973-983.
    8. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Individual choice and reputation distribution of cooperative behaviors among heterogeneous groups," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-46.
    9. Guo, Tian & Du, Chunpeng & Shi, Lei, 2024. "Evolution of cooperation on interdependent networks: The impact of asymmetric punishment," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    10. Szolnoki, Attila & Chen, Xiaojie, 2020. "Gradual learning supports cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Lu, Peng & Wang, Fang, 2015. "Heterogeneity of inferring reputation probability in cooperative behaviors for the spatial prisoners’ dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 433(C), pages 367-378.
    12. Wang, Dongqi & Shuai, Xuanyue & Pan, Qiuhui & Li, Jingye & Lan, Xiaolong & He, Mingfeng, 2020. "Long deliberation times promote cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 537(C).
    13. Xia, Ke, 2021. "Average abundance function of multi-player threshold public goods without initial endowment evolutionary game model under differential aspiration levels and redistribution mechanism," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    14. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2016. "How the expanded crowd-funding mechanism of some southern rural areas in China affects cooperative behaviors in threshold public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 649-655.
    15. Wu, Jianshe & Hou, Yanqiao & Jiao, Licheng & Li, Huijie, 2014. "Community structure inhibits cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 412(C), pages 169-179.
    16. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Lu, Xi & Mo, Hongming & Deng, Yong, 2015. "An evidential opinion dynamics model based on heterogeneous social influential power," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 98-107.
    18. Lv, Shaojie & Wang, Xianjia, 2020. "The impact of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in public goods game with exclusion," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    19. Yang, Yixin & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2023. "The influence of environment-based autonomous mobility on the evolution of cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Li, Siran & Xiao, Fuyuan, 2023. "Normal distribution based on maximum Deng entropy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:403:y:2014:i:c:p:284-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.