IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v37y2013icp254-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perceptions of Scottish inshore fishers about marine protected areas

Author

Listed:
  • Pita, Cristina
  • Theodossiou, Ioannis
  • Pierce, Graham J.

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasingly used as tools for fishery management and marine ecosystem conservation. MPAs directly impact, and are impacted by, the fishing industry and knowing fishers’ attitudes towards MPAs is critical for their success. In general, fishing activity is permitted within the boundaries of MPAs in Scotland but with different levels of restrictions, thus impacting differently on different sectors of the fishing industry. The present study used a questionnaire survey to investigate the attitudes towards closed areas of Scottish inshore fishers operating different gears. The results show that different gear-users expressed significantly different opinions about closed areas as management tools, their ability to protect stocks and decrease conflicts. Furthermore, a logistic model revealed that, besides the gear-type fishers operate, other characteristics (educational level, location and perceptions of compliance) influence fishers’ opinions about closed areas. Fishers are not a homogeneous collective and the difference in perceptions about closed areas among Scottish inshore fishers operating different gears has important implications for management. Regarding the important role MPAs will play in the long-term conservation and fisheries management plans in Europe, understanding the variability in fishers’ attitudes within the same, and between different, groups will facilitate successful planning and management of MPAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pita, Cristina & Theodossiou, Ioannis & Pierce, Graham J., 2013. "The perceptions of Scottish inshore fishers about marine protected areas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 254-263.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:37:y:2013:i:c:p:254-263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X12000954
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabrizio D’Ascenzo & Andrea Rocchi & Stefano Cerioni & Gaetano Zarlenga & Nicolò Passeri & Francesco Piacentini & Cristina Lo Fazio & Cristina Gerardis & Clara Cicatiello, 2022. "Conveying environmental information to fishers: a smartphone application on marine protected areas," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 453-465, September.
    2. Barley Kincaid, Kate & Rose, George & Mahudi, Humphrey, 2014. "Fishers' perception of a multiple-use marine protected area: Why communities and gear users differ at Mafia Island, Tanzania," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 226-235.
    3. Veronica Relano & Tiffany Mak & Shelumiel Ortiz & Daniel Pauly, 2022. "Stakeholder Perceptions Can Distinguish ‘Paper Parks’ from Marine Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Thomas, Alyssa S. & Milfont, Taciano L. & Gavin, Michael C., 2015. "What determines fishers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards regulations? A case study from the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 547-554.
    5. Lu, Yifan & Yamazaki, Satoshi, 2023. "Antarctic Sanctuary: Behavioural Impact of International Marine Protected Areas," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335483, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Karadzic, Vanja & Grin, John & Antunes, Paula & Banovic, Marija, 2014. "Social learning in fish producers' organizations: How fishers perceive their membership experience and what they learn from it," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 427-437.
    7. Alpina Begossi, 2014. "Ecological, cultural, and economic approaches to managing artisanal fisheries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 5-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:37:y:2013:i:c:p:254-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.