IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v34y2010i1p193-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pretty Good Yield and exploited fishes

Author

Listed:
  • Hilborn, Ray

Abstract

While much of traditional fisheries theory has concentrated on maximum or optimum yield, the reality of fisheries management is that biomass yield is only one of the several indicators of fisheries performance, and desired outcomes generally only need to provide something near the maximum possible yield. A range of policies are explored to find those that produce "Pretty Good Yield" defined as sustainable yield at least 80% of the maximum sustainable yield. Such yields are generally obtained over a broad range of stock sizes (20-50% of unfished stock abundance), and this range is not sensitive to the population's basic life history parameters such as natural mortality rate, somatic growth rate, or age at maturity. The most important biological parameter determining this range is the intensity of recruitment compensation. Meta-analysis shows compensation is usually strong and there is reasonably little yield lost at what are now widely accepted definitions of overfishing or risk for most stocks. Similarly, maintaining stocks at 50% of unfished stock abundance for ecological or economic reasons results in little expected loss of yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilborn, Ray, 2010. "Pretty Good Yield and exploited fishes," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 193-196, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:193-196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(09)00068-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lemos, Ricardo T., 2016. "An alternative stock-recruitment function for age-structured models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 14-26.
    2. Stäbler, Moritz & Kempf, Alexander & Mackinson, Steven & Poos, Jan Jaap & Garcia, Clement & Temming, Axel, 2016. "Combining efforts to make maximum sustainable yields and good environmental status match in a food-web model of the southern North Sea," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 17-30.
    3. Barman, Binandita & Ghosh, Bapan, 2019. "Explicit impacts of harvesting in delayed predator-prey models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 213-228.
    4. Ricouard, Antoine & Lehuta, Sigrid & Mahévas, Stéphanie, 2023. "Are maximum yields sustainable? Effect of intra-annual time-scales on MSY, stability and resilience," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 479(C).
    5. Jessica Zamborain-Mason & Joshua E. Cinner & M. Aaron MacNeil & Nicholas A. J. Graham & Andrew S. Hoey & Maria Beger & Andrew J. Brooks & David J. Booth & Graham J. Edgar & David A. Feary & Sebastian , 2023. "Sustainable reference points for multispecies coral reef fisheries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Parés, Claudio & Dresdner, Jorge & Salgado, Hugo, 2015. "Who should set the total allowable catch? Social preferences and legitimacy in fisheries management institutions," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 36-43.
    7. Bellier, Edwige & Sæther, Bernt-Erik & Engen, Steinar, 2021. "Sustainable strategies for harvesting predators and prey in a fluctuating environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    8. Tim Cashion & Santiago de la Puente & Dyhia Belhabib & Daniel Pauly & Dirk Zeller & U Rashid Sumaila, 2018. "Establishing company level fishing revenue and profit losses from fisheries: A bottom-up approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:193-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.