IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v38y2010i3-4p203-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single vs. multiple objective supplier selection in a make to order environment

Author

Listed:
  • Sawik, Tadeusz

Abstract

The problem of allocation of orders for custom parts among suppliers in make to order manufacturing is formulated as a single- or multi-objective mixed integer program. Given a set of customer orders for products, the decision maker needs to decide from which supplier to purchase custom parts required for each customer order. The selection of suppliers is based on price and quality of purchased parts and reliability of on time delivery. The risk of defective or unreliable supplies is controlled by the maximum number of delivery patterns (combinations of suppliers delivery dates) for which the average defect rate or late delivery rate can be unacceptable. Furthermore, the quantity or business volume discounts offered by the suppliers are considered. Numerical examples are presented and some computational results are reported.

Suggested Citation

  • Sawik, Tadeusz, 2010. "Single vs. multiple objective supplier selection in a make to order environment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 203-212, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:38:y:2010:i:3-4:p:203-212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(09)00066-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas G. Hall & 'Maseka Lesaoana & Chris N. Potts, 2001. "Scheduling with Fixed Delivery Dates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 134-144, February.
    2. Pokharel, Shaligram, 2008. "A two objective model for decision making in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 378-388, February.
    3. Liao, Zhiying & Rittscher, Jens, 2007. "Integration of supplier selection, procurement lot sizing and carrier selection under dynamic demand conditions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 502-510, June.
    4. Chaudhry, Sohail S. & Forst, Frank G. & Zydiak, James L., 1993. "Vendor selection with price breaks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 52-66, October.
    5. Weber, Charles A. & Current, John R., 1993. "A multiobjective approach to vendor selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 173-184, July.
    6. Schotanus, Fredo & Telgen, Jan & de Boer, Luitzen, 2009. "Unraveling quantity discounts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 510-521, June.
    7. Ustun, Ozden & DemI[dot above]rtas, Ezgi Aktar, 2008. "An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 509-521, August.
    8. Xia, Weijun & Wu, Zhiming, 2007. "Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 494-504, October.
    9. Ghodsypour, S. H. & O'Brien, C., 2001. "The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 15-27, August.
    10. Demirtas, Ezgi Aktar & Üstün, Özden, 2008. "An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 76-90, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olhager, Jan & Prajogo, Daniel I., 2012. "The impact of manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives: A survey comparing make-to-order and make-to-stock firms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 159-165, April.
    2. Kaya, Onur, 2011. "Outsourcing vs. in-house production: a comparison of supply chain contracts with effort dependent demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 168-178, April.
    3. Hu, Kuo-Jen & Yu, Vincent F., 2016. "An integrated approach for the electronic contract manufacturer selection problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 68-81.
    4. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2011. "Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 194-208, April.
    5. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2015. "On the fair optimization of cost and customer service level in a supply chain under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 58-66.
    6. Li, Haitao & Womer, Keith, 2012. "Optimizing the supply chain configuration for make-to-order manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 118-128.
    7. Morais, Danielle C. & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira, 2012. "Group decision making on water resources based on analysis of individual rankings," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 42-52, January.
    8. Heese, H. Sebastian, 2015. "Single versus multiple sourcing and the evolution of bargaining positions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 125-133.
    9. Tadeusz Sawik, 2018. "Selection of a dynamic supply portfolio under delay and disruption risks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 760-782, January.
    10. Yan, Yingchen & Zhao, Ruiqing & Lan, Yanfei, 2017. "Asymmetric retailers with different moving sequences: Group buying vs. individual purchasing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 903-917.
    11. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.
    12. Qin, Hu & Luo, Meifeng & Gao, Xiang & Lim, Andrew, 2012. "The freight allocation problem with all-units quantity-based discount: A heuristic algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 415-423.
    13. Dong, Binwei & Tang, Wansheng & Zhou, Chi & Ren, Yufei, 2021. "Is dual sourcing a better choice? The impact of reliability improvement and contract manufacturer encroachment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Hosseininasab, Amin & Ahmadi, Abbas, 2015. "Selecting a supplier portfolio with value, development, and risk consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 146-156.
    15. Liu, Ming & Liu, Zhongzheng & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Chu, Chengbin & Zheng, Feifeng, 2022. "An optimization approach for multi-echelon supply chain viability with disruption risk minimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Maheswar Singh Mahapatra & Pravash Chandra Pradhan & J. K. Jha, 2022. "Sourcing decisions with order allocation under supply disruption risk considering quantitative and qualitative criteria," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3291-3333, September.
    17. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    18. Mukherjee, Krishnendu, 2014. "Supplier selection criteria and methods: past, present and future," MPRA Paper 60079, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash, 2016. "A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 68-87.
    20. Zhou, Yuan & Xie, Jinxing, 2014. "Potentially self-defeating: Group buying in a two-tier supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 42-52.
    21. Hammami, Ramzi & Temponi, Cecilia & Frein, Yannick, 2014. "A scenario-based stochastic model for supplier selection in global context with multiple buyers, currency fluctuation uncertainties, and price discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 159-170.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2011. "Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 194-208, April.
    2. Lin, Rong-Ho, 2012. "An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 55-61.
    3. Jadidi, O. & Zolfaghari, S. & Cavalieri, S., 2014. "A new normalized goal programming model for multi-objective problems: A case of supplier selection and order allocation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 158-165.
    4. Crama, Y. & Pascual J., R. & Torres, A., 2004. "Optimal procurement decisions in the presence of total quantity discounts and alternative product recipes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 364-378, December.
    5. Ali Ekici & Baṣak Altan & Okan Örsan Özener, 2016. "Pricing decisions in a strategic single retailer/dual suppliers setting under order size constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 1887-1898, April.
    6. Hu, Kuo-Jen & Yu, Vincent F., 2016. "An integrated approach for the electronic contract manufacturer selection problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 68-81.
    7. Xia, Weijun & Wu, Zhiming, 2007. "Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 494-504, October.
    8. Zeki Ayağ & Funda Samanlioglu, 2016. "An intelligent approach to supplier evaluation in automotive sector," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 889-903, August.
    9. Ching-Ter Chang & Huang-Mu Chen & Zheng-Yun Zhuang, 2014. "Integrated multi-choice goal programming and multi-segment goal programming for supplier selection considering imperfect-quality and price-quantity discounts in a multiple sourcing environment," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 1101-1111, May.
    10. Amid, A. & Ghodsypour, S.H. & O'Brien, C., 2011. "A weighted max-min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 139-145, May.
    11. S W Lam & L C Tang, 2006. "Multiobjective vendor allocation in multiechelon inventory systems: a spreadsheet model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 561-578, May.
    12. Mukherjee, Krishnendu, 2014. "Supplier selection criteria and methods: past, present and future," MPRA Paper 60079, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Pinior, Beate & Conraths, Franz J. & Petersen, Brigitte & Selhorst, Thomas, 2015. "Decision support for risks managers in the case of deliberate food contamination: The dairy industry as an example," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 41-48.
    14. Firouz, Mohammad & Keskin, Burcu B. & Melouk, Sharif H., 2017. "An integrated supplier selection and inventory problem with multi-sourcing and lateral transshipments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 77-93.
    15. Mukherjee, Krishnendu & Sarkar, Bijon & Bhattacharyya, Ardhendu, 2012. "Supplier selection by F-compromise method: a case study of cement industry of NE India," MPRA Paper 57786, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2013.
    16. Harpreet Kaur & Surya Prakash Singh, 2019. "Flexible dynamic sustainable procurement model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 651-691, February.
    17. Pinior, Beate & Conraths, Franz J. & Petersen, Brigitte & Selhorst, Thomas, 2015. "Reprint of “Decision support for risks managers in the case of deliberate food contamination: The dairy industry as an example”," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 114-122.
    18. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.
    19. Qin, Hu & Luo, Meifeng & Gao, Xiang & Lim, Andrew, 2012. "The freight allocation problem with all-units quantity-based discount: A heuristic algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 415-423.
    20. Degraeve, Zeger & Labro, Eva & Roodhooft, Filip, 2000. "An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 34-58, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:38:y:2010:i:3-4:p:203-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.