IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v1y1973i1p79-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision analysis by decision tree

Author

Listed:
  • King, JR

Abstract

The process of decision analysis by decision tree for any decision maker may essentially be summarized as follows: 1. (a) Form the decision tree for the problem;2. (b) Quantify your judgement by assigning subjective probabilities to the possible outcomes in the decision tree;3. (c) Quantify your monetary preference by determining your preference function curve;4. (d) Replace the monetary consequences of the possible outcomes in the decision tree by their corresponding preference values;5. (e) Expect out, fold back and prune the decision tree to determine the decision to be made. This process, which is described in the paper, enables complex decision problems to be formulated and solved in a logical manner, consistent with the stated beliefs of the decision maker in relation to his attitude to uncertainty and risk, expressed in quantitative terms. A simple numerical example is used to illustrate how the decision analysis technique can be applied in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • King, JR, 1973. "Decision analysis by decision tree," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 79-105, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:1:y:1973:i:1:p:79-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(73)90007-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luca Urciuoli & Juha Hintsa, 2021. "Can digital ecosystems mitigate risks in sea transport operations? Estimating benefits for supply chain stakeholders," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(2), pages 237-267, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:1:y:1973:i:1:p:79-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.