IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v17y1989i5p397-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology choice and consulting ethics in management science

Author

Listed:
  • Maclagan, P

Abstract

This paper has been written against a background of growing concern for business and professional ethics generally, and draws most of its material from the field of organisation development where such issues have been on the agenda for more than a decade. It is the author's view that a cross-fertilisation of ideas on the subject of ethical practice between OD and Management Science/Operational Research is long overdue. There is a rising awareness within MS/OR that systems or contingency approaches to consultancy interventions call for the ability to discriminate between situations, so that an appropriate choice of methodology may be made. There is less awareness of the ethical issues which this implies. Consultants are required to be competent in making such choices, not to misrepresent their capabilities, and to take account of conflicting interests within organisations. This calls, among other things, for impartiality, diagnostic skill and a general understanding of behaviour in organisations. Following an analysis of obligations to clients and other affected parties, a summary of guiding principles for ethical consulting practice is offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Maclagan, P, 1989. "Methodology choice and consulting ethics in management science," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 397-407.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:5:p:397-407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(89)90037-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    2. J-R Córdoba, 2006. "Using Foucault to analyse ethics in the practice of problem structuring methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(9), pages 1027-1034, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:5:p:397-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.