IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v16y1988i6p533-546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BARK--Budget allocation by ranking and knapsack

Author

Listed:
  • Eilon, Samuel
  • Williamson, Ian P

Abstract

Budget Allocation by Ranking and Knapsack (BARK) has been developed to solve a particular problem of determining which projects should be selected (from a given array) for implementation, subject to budgetary constraints. This problem is often encountered in the public sector, where the values (in financial terms) of competing projects or programmes are difficult or impossible to quantify, but where the projects may be ranked in terms of their perceived worth or benefit. Provided a reasonable level of agreement on ranking can be achieved, the rankings can be converted to surrogate measures of value, so that the selection of projects then becomes a standard knapsack problem. The paper describes how BARK has been used in a particular case and how the methodology can be extended to situations when the budget is not defined as a single value, but as a range. The methodology may be applied in many areas, for example in the allocation of an R&D budget, and is therefore not confined to the public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Eilon, Samuel & Williamson, Ian P, 1988. "BARK--Budget allocation by ranking and knapsack," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 533-546.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:16:y:1988:i:6:p:533-546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(88)90027-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:16:y:1988:i:6:p:533-546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.