IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v14y1986i1p57-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling auditor utility functions

Author

Listed:
  • Crosby, Michael A
  • Moskowitz, Herbert
  • Mahesh, Sathiadev

Abstract

Utility functions for profits and losses are obtained on 14 practicing auditors. Data were elicited through personal interviews with audit partners and seniors. The appropriate utility functions that describe the risk characteristics of the auditors and fit the certainty equivalent responses are found using a general summed exponential function and nonlinear programming to obtain its parameters. The richness of the summed exponential in assuming a variety of utility shapes and its mathematical tractability, for example, in manipulating models makes it attractive for expressing an individual's utility function. Use of the summed exponential mitigates the difficulties in assessing a utility function by simplifying the assessments and circumvents the need for the analyst to decide on the appropriate functional form. The empirical results show, for example, that a firm's seniors are less averse to losses than its partners. With respect to gains, a variety of utility shapes/risk preferences are exhibited with most being risk averse for large sums of money. The implications for an auditing firm are then discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Crosby, Michael A & Moskowitz, Herbert & Mahesh, Sathiadev, 1986. "Modeling auditor utility functions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 57-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:14:y:1986:i:1:p:57-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(86)90008-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:14:y:1986:i:1:p:57-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.