IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v33y1990i2p275-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequalities for predictive ratios and posterior variances in natural exponential families

Author

Listed:
  • Kadane, Joseph B.
  • Olkin, Ingram
  • Scarsini, Marco

Abstract

The predictive ratio is considered as a measure of spread for the predictive distribution. It is shown that, in the exponential families, ordering according to the predictive ratio is equivalent to ordering according to the posterior covariance matrix of the parameters. This result generalizes an inequality due to Chaloner and Duncan who consider the predictive ratio for a beta-binomial distribution and compare it with a predictive ratio for the binomial distribution with a degenerate prior. The predictive ratio at x1 and x2 is defined to be pg(x1)pg(x2)/[pg()]2 = hg(x1, x2), where pg(x1) = [integral operator] [latin small letter f with hook](x1[short parallel][theta]) g([theta]) d[theta] is the predictive distribution of x1 with respect to the prior g. We prove that hg(x1, x2) >= hg*(x1, x2) for all x1 and x2 if [latin small letter f with hook](x[short parallel][theta]) is in the natural exponential family and Covg[short parallel]x([theta]) >= Covg*[short parallel]x([theta]) in the Löwner sense, for all x on a straight line from x1 to x2. We then restrict the class of prior distributions to the conjugate class and ask whether the posterior covariance inequality obtains if g and g* differ in that the "sample size"

Suggested Citation

  • Kadane, Joseph B. & Olkin, Ingram & Scarsini, Marco, 1990. "Inequalities for predictive ratios and posterior variances in natural exponential families," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 275-285, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:33:y:1990:i:2:p:275-285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047-259X(90)90051-I
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:33:y:1990:i:2:p:275-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.