IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jelect/v23y2010i4p59-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Debate over Re-Licensing the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Watts, Richard
  • Hines, Paul
  • Dowds, Jonathan

Abstract

In 2009, the NRC's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board approved a 20-year license extension for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power plant. Less than seven months later, the Vermont State Senate voted 26-4 to block the required certificate for public good. How did a plant seen as likely to be re-licensed become the first in 20 years to be rejected in a public vote?

Suggested Citation

  • Watts, Richard & Hines, Paul & Dowds, Jonathan, 2010. "The Debate over Re-Licensing the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 59-67, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jelect:v:23:y:2010:i:4:p:59-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040-6190(10)00098-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Nelson & M. V. Ramana, 2023. "Managing decline: Devaluation and just transition at Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 1951-1969, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jelect:v:23:y:2010:i:4:p:59-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600875/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.