1. Tobey, James A, 1990. "The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test," Kyklos, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(2), pages 191-209.
2. Adam B. Jaffe et al., 1995. "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 132-163, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
3. Rauscher, Michael, 1994. "On Ecological Dumping," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(0), pages 822-40, Supplemen. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
4. Palmer, Karen & Oates, Wallace E & Portney, Paul R, 1995. "Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 119-32, Fall. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
5. Simpson, R. David & Bradford, Robert III, 1996. "Taxing Variable Cost: Environmental Regulation as Industrial Policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 282-300, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

1. Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2005. "Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? an Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis," Cahiers de recherche 0505, GREEN. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2005. "Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? an Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis," Cahiers de recherche 0505, Université Laval - Département d'économique. [Downloadable!]
2. Emilio Galdeano Gómez, 2002. "Competitividad de las cooperativas hortofrutícolas: análisis del impacto económico de las acciones de calidad y medioambientales en las OPFH andaluzas," CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa, CIRIEC-España, issue 41, pages 53-83, August. [Downloadable!]
3. William Konchak & Unai Pascual, 2005. "Converging Paradigms for a Co-evolutionary Environmental Limit Discourse," Environmental Economy and Policy Research Working Papers 14.2005, University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economics, revised 2005. [Downloadable!]
4. Théophile, AZOMAHOU & Raouf, BOUCEKKINE & Phu, NUYEN VAN, 2003. "Energy consumption, technological progress and economic policy," Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) Discussion Paper 2003025, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES). [Downloadable!]
5. Francisco J. André & Paula González & Nicolás Porteiro, 2007. "Strategic Quality Competition and the Porter Hypothesis," Working Papers 07.03, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
6. Marklund, Per-Olov, 2004. "Essays on Productive Efficiency, Shadow Prices, and Human Capital. PhD Thesis," UmeÃ¥ Economic Studies 621, Umeå University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
7. Feichtinger, G. & Hartl, R.F. & Kort, P.M., 2001. "Dynamic investment behavior taking into account ageing of the capital good," Discussion Paper 13, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
8. Raouf Boucekkine & Natali Hritonenko & Yuri Yatsenko, . "Optimal Firm Behavior under Environmental Constraints," Working Papers 2008_11, Department of Economics, University of Glasgow. [Downloadable!]
9. Vries, Frans P. de & Withagen, Cees, 2005. "Innovation and environmental stringency: the case of sulfur dioxide abatement," Discussion Paper 18, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
10. Brännlund, Runar, 2008. "Productivity and environmental regulations - A long run analysis of the Swedish industry," UmeÃ¥ Economic Studies 728, Umeå University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
11. Indrani, Roy Chowdhury, 2006. "Re-visiting the Porter Hypothesis," MPRA Paper 7899, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
12. Marklund, Per-Olov, 2003. "Environmental Regulation and Firm Efficiency: Studying the Porter Hypothesis using a Directional Output Distance Function," UmeÃ¥ Economic Studies 619, Umeå University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
13. Martin Klein & Jaqueline Rothfels, . "Can Environmental Regulation of X-Ineffecient Firms Create a -Double Dividend-?," IWH Discussion Papers 103, Halle Institute for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
14. Ziesemer, Thomas & Kriechel, Ben, 2007. "The Environmental Porter Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and a Model of Timing of Adoption," UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 024, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology. [Downloadable!]
15. Roediger-Schluga, Thomas, 2002. "Some micro-evidence on the "Porter Hypothesis" from Austrian VOC emission standards," ERSA conference papers ersa02p290, European Regional Science Association. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
    • Thomas Roediger-Schluga, 2003. "Some Micro-Evidence on the "Porter Hypothesis" from Austrian VOC Emission Standards," Growth and Change, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, vol. 34(3), pages 359-379. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
16. David Popp, 2005. "Uncertain R&D and the Porter Hypothesis," Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1423-1423. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
17. Kort, P.M. & Feichtinger, G. & Hartl, R.F. & Veliov, V.M., 2003. "Environmental policy, the porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: effects of learining and techonological progress," Discussion Paper 61, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
    • Feichtinger, Gustav & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M. & Veliov, Vladimir M., 2005. "Environmental policy, the porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: Effects of learning and technological progress," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 434-446, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
18. F. Ricci, 2004. "Environmental Policy and Growth when Inputs are Differentiated in Pollution Intensity," THEMA Working Papers 2004-23, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
    • Francesco Ricci, 2007. "Environmental policy and growth when inputs are differentiated in pollution intensity," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 38(3), pages 285-310, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)