Every year around Christmas there are shortages of the "hot toy." Why don't sellers raise the price? The hot-toy problem is puzzling if we assume that a "big" shortage implies that a $500 bill is being left on the ground. I show that a big shortage does not necessarily imply large losses in profits. Indeed, the bigger the shortage as conventionally measured the smaller the loss in profit from underpricing. The analysis of the hot-toy problem demonstrates that the conventional definition of a shortage can be misleading and should be modified in favor of a definition based on the difference between the marginal willingness to pay and price.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 67 (2008) Issue (Month): 2 (August) Pages: 512-516 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF