IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v69y2016i11p5371-5376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does safety-oriented corporate social responsibility promote innovation in the Thai trucking industry?

Author

Listed:
  • Ueki, Yasushi
  • Jeenanunta, Chawalit
  • Machikita, Tomohiro
  • Tsuji, Masatsugu

Abstract

Modern-day firms need to become more innovative while complying strictly with increasingly complex legal and regulatory requirements and fulfilling their corporate social responsibility (CSR) for multiple stakeholders. How to turn legal, regulatory, and voluntary requirements into business opportunities is a new managerial challenge for firms. This study investigates the relationship between safety-oriented CSR and innovation, using the case of Thai trucking industry. To empirically examine the relationship between CSR and innovation, this study performs a path analysis and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The empirical results support the association between CSR and innovation. However, skilled employees are key elements for firms to stimulate innovation with CSR activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ueki, Yasushi & Jeenanunta, Chawalit & Machikita, Tomohiro & Tsuji, Masatsugu, 2016. "Does safety-oriented corporate social responsibility promote innovation in the Thai trucking industry?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5371-5376.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:11:p:5371-5376
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296316303447
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laforet, Sylvie, 2008. "Size, strategic, and market orientation affects on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 753-764, July.
    2. Forza, Cipriano & Filippini, Roberto, 1998. "TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Slater, Stanley F. & Narver, John C., 2000. "The Positive Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability: A Balanced Replication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 69-73, April.
    4. Qu, Riliang & Zhang, Zelin, 2015. "Market orientation and business performance in MNC foreign subsidiaries— Moderating effects of integration and responsiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 919-924.
    5. Subramanian, Ram & Gopalakrishna, Pradeep, 2001. "The market orientation-performance relationship in the context of a developing economy: An empirical analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Bocquet, Rachel & Le Bas, Christian & Mothe, Caroline & Poussing, Nicolas, 2013. "Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 642-654.
    7. Li Sun & Marty Stuebs, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Productivity: Evidence from the Chemical Industry in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 251-263, December.
    8. Marcus Wagner, 2010. "Corporate Social Performance and Innovation with High Social Benefits: A Quantitative Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(4), pages 581-594, July.
    9. Leiponen, Aija, 2005. "Skills and innovation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 303-323, June.
    10. repec:hal:journl:hal-00918528 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Dima Jamali, 2008. "A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 213-231, September.
    12. Alan C. Acock, 2013. "Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number dsemus, March.
    13. Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku, 1996. "Market orientation and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 93-103, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yun‐an Bai, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate innovation output: Empirical evidence based on Chinese listed companies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3534-3547, December.
    2. repec:thr:techub:10031:y:2022:i:1:p:522-552 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Yan lI, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility of Chinese Manufacturing Companies' effect on Green Business Strategy, Innovation and Performance," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 31(1), pages 522-552, May.
    4. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping, 2020. "The influence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Broadstock, David C. & Matousek, Roman & Meyer, Martin & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 99-110.
    6. Suyun Chen & Yu Ji, 2022. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Qinghua Zhu & Fei Zou & Pan Zhang, 2019. "The role of innovation for performance improvement through corporate social responsibility practices among small and medium‐sized suppliers in China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 341-350, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vishal K. Gupta & Gizem Atav & Dev K. Dutta, 2019. "Market orientation research: a qualitative synthesis and future research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 649-670, August.
    2. Smirnova, Maria M. & Rebiazina, Vera A. & Frösén, Johanna, 2018. "Customer orientation as a multidimensional construct: Evidence from the Russian markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 457-467.
    3. repec:dgr:rugsom:02b13 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Suyun Chen & Yu Ji, 2022. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Dawid Szutowski & Piotr Ratajczak, 2016. "The Relation between CSR and Innovation. Model Approach," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(2), pages 1-1.
    6. Kok, Robert A.W. & Hillebrand, Bas & Biemans, Wim G., 2002. "Market-oriented product development as an organizational learning capability: findings from two cases," Research Report 02B13, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    7. Ellis, Paul D., 2010. "International trade intermediaries and the transfer of marketing knowledge in transition economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 16-33, February.
    8. Riillo, Cesare Fabio Antonio & Sarracino, Francesco, 2014. "Motivations for Corporate Social Responsibility: all talk and no walk?," MPRA Paper 60211, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Nguyen, Bang & Yu, Xiaoyu & Melewar, T.C. & Gupta, Suraksha, 2016. "Critical brand innovation factors (CBIF): Understanding innovation and market performance in the Chinese high-tech service industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2471-2479.
    10. repec:mgs:ijoied:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:17-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. María del Mar Ramos-González & Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo, 2022. "Effects of socially responsible human resource management (SR-HRM) on innovation and reputation in entrepreneurial SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1205-1233, September.
    12. Xiaoyan Pan & Kum-Sik Oh & Mengmeng Wang, 2021. "Strategic Orientation, Digital Capabilities, and New Product Development in Emerging Market Firms: The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Langerak, F., 2002. "What is the Predictive Power of Market Orientation?," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-88-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Ravindra Jain & Cherry Jain & Prachi Jain, 2013. "Integrated Framework of Antecedents and Effects of Market Orientation," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(4), pages 425-445, November.
    15. Rachel Bocquet & Christian Le Bas & Caroline Mothe & Nicolas Poussing, 2017. "CSR, Innovation, and Firm Performance in Sluggish Growth Contexts: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 241-254, November.
    16. Namita Kaushik & R. C. Dangwal, 2023. "Do Entrepreneurial Orientation and Market Orientation Matter for MSMEs Performance? A Systematic Literature Review," Paradigm, , vol. 27(1), pages 78-92, June.
    17. Xin Pan & Paresha Sinha & Xuanjin Chen, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and eco‐innovation: The triple bottom line perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 214-228, January.
    18. Hans Rawhouser & Michael Cummings & Scott L. Newbert, 2019. "Social Impact Measurement: Current Approaches and Future Directions for Social Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 82-115, January.
    19. Seemant Kumar Yadav & Vikas Tripathi & Geetika Goel, 2021. "Dis-Aggregated Effect of Market Orientation on Firms' Performance: A Study on Indian Small and Medium-Scale (SMEs) Manufacturers," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 87-108, July.
    20. Yuan Li & YongFeng Sun & Yi Liu, 2006. "An empirical study of SOEs' market orientation in transitional China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 93-113, March.
    21. José Manuel Santos‐Jaén & Antonia Madrid‐Guijarro & Domingo García‐Pérez‐de‐Lema, 2021. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The mediating role of debt terms and human capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1200-1215, July.
    22. Nicolas Poussing, 2019. "Does corporate social responsibility encourage sustainable innovation adoption? Empirical evidence from Luxembourg," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 681-689, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Truck; Safety; CSR; Innovation; QCA;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:11:p:5371-5376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.