There are two important sources of uncertainty: randomness and fuzziness. Randomness models the stochastic variability of all possible outcomes of a situation, and fuzziness relates to the unsharp boundaries of the parameters of the model. In this sense, randomness is largely an instrument of a normative analysis that focuses on the future, while fuzziness is more an instrument of a descriptive analysis reflecting the past and its implications. Clearly, randomness and fuzziness are complementary, and so a natural question is how fuzzy variables could interact with the type of random variables found in actuarial science. This article focuses on one important dimension of this issue, fuzzy random variables (FRVs). The goal is to introduce IME readers to FRVs and to illustrate how naturally compatible and complementary randomness and fuzziness are.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 44 (2009) Issue (Month): 2 (April) Pages: 307-314 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF