IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iepoli/v41y2017icp67-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does upstream regulation matter when measuring the efficiency impact of information technology? Evidence across EU and US industries

Author

Listed:
  • Papaioannou, Sotiris K.
  • Dimelis, Sophia P.

Abstract

We examine the role of ICT in reducing industry level technical inefficiency, controlling for the impact of upstream regulations. We conduct industry level stochastic frontier analysis and estimate a technical inefficiency model which allows for an interaction between ICT and upstream regulation. A panel dataset from EU and US industries is used for the period 1995–2007. We find that ICT contributes significantly in reducing technical inefficiency in low technology manufacturing. In service industries this influence is strong only at low levels of regulation. Likewise, in the same sectors, anticompetitive regulation exerts an increasing effect on inefficiency. We fail to establish any significant influence of ICT on the efficiency of high technology industries. When considering alternative dimensions of regulation, most regression estimates confirm baseline results as regards the inefficiency influence of either ICT or regulation. However, the conditional impact of ICT differentiates and depends on the type of regulation examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Papaioannou, Sotiris K. & Dimelis, Sophia P., 2017. "Does upstream regulation matter when measuring the efficiency impact of information technology? Evidence across EU and US industries," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 67-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:41:y:2017:i:c:p:67-80
    DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2017.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167624516300944
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2017.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeffrey Kouton & Rafiou R. Bétila & Moïse Lawin, 2021. "The Impact of ICT Development on Health Outcomes in Africa: Does Economic Freedom Matter?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1830-1869, December.
    2. Cuiping Yu & Decai Tang & Acheampong Paul Tenkorang & Brandon J. Bethel, 2021. "The Impact of the Opening of Producer Services on the International Competitiveness of Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Igna, Ioana A. & Rincon-Aznar, Ana & Venturini, Francesco, 2019. "Upstream regulation, factor demand and productivity: Cross-industry differences in OECD countries, 1975–2007," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Ke-Liang Wang & Ting-Ting Sun & Ru-Yu Xu, 2023. "The impact of artificial intelligence on total factor productivity: empirical evidence from China’s manufacturing enterprises," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 1113-1146, April.
    5. Pieri, Fabio & Vecchi, Michela & Venturini, Francesco, 2018. "Modelling the joint impact of R&D and ICT on productivity: A frontier analysis approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1842-1852.
    6. Fabio Pieri & Michela Vecchi & Francesco Venturini, 2017. "Modelling the joint impact of R and D and ICT on productivity: A frontier analysis approach," DEM Working Papers 2017/13, Department of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ICT; Upstream regulations; Technical efficiency; Stochastic frontier analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:41:y:2017:i:c:p:67-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505549 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.