IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v97y2010i1p44-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making sense of delays in outpatient specialty care: A system perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Rouppe van der Voort, Marc (MBV)
  • van Merode, Frits (GG)
  • Berden, Bart (HJJM)

Abstract

Objectives To assess whether delays to outpatient specialty care can be solved by improving the way supply and demand are matched, without adding capacity.Methods A systematic review of the interventions applied by 18 clinics using the model of 'advanced access' and a statistical analysis of the effects of the interventions on their delays.Results The clinics applied different combinations of interventions aimed at improving the way they match supply and demand, improving the efficiency of the way supply is organised and at reducing unnecessary demand. Fourteen clinics show statistically significant improvements. Two probably significantly improved and two clinics did not. Their access reduced on average 55%, from 47 to 21 days.Conclusions It seems that delays in outpatient specialty care can be solved to a large extend by improving the way supply and demand are matched. Policy makers should analyse whether delays are caused by capacity problems or matching problems. For the latter, it appears more effective to invest in the ability to react then the ability to plan. Policy makers should create incentives for clinics to keep access short and remove incentives that stimulate delays.

Suggested Citation

  • Rouppe van der Voort, Marc (MBV) & van Merode, Frits (GG) & Berden, Bart (HJJM), 2010. "Making sense of delays in outpatient specialty care: A system perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 44-52, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:97:y:2010:i:1:p:44-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(10)00075-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:97:y:2010:i:1:p:44-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.