IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v94y2010i3p211-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scarcity and inequity of mental health research resources in low-and-middle income countries: A global survey

Author

Listed:
  • Razzouk, Denise
  • Sharan, Pratap
  • Gallo, Carla
  • Gureje, Oye
  • Lamberte, Exaltacion E.
  • de Jesus Mari, Jair
  • Mazzotti, Guido
  • Patel, Vikram
  • Swartz, Leslie
  • Olifson, Sylvie
  • Levav, Itzhak
  • de Francisco, Andres
  • Saxena, Shekhar

Abstract

Objective To map mental health research capacity and resources in low-and-middle-income countries (LAMIC) for the years 1993-2003.Method Mental health researchers from 114 LAMIC in three continents were identified through their publications in two databases (Medline and PsycInfo) and from local grey literature. A questionnaire was developed and sent to authors to elicit information about researchers' background, available resources and details of up to three recent projects.Results 4208 researchers from 83 countries were identified through 6340 mental health indexed-publications and 3598 publications from the grey literature. 912 researchers from 52 countries completed the questionnaires. Researchers and publications were concentrated in 10% of the countries. Respondents reported participation in 1847 projects, most of which were devoted to depression and anxiety disorders, substance misuse and psychoses. Epidemiologic studies, social, psychological and clinical research accounted for 80% of all projects. Two-thirds of projects had received external funding, and less than one-third of them were conducted in collaboration with other countries.Conclusion Mental health research capacity is scarce and unequally distributed in LAMIC. Global agencies for health research as well as LAMIC with higher concentrations of researchers and scientific output should play a more decisive role in strengthening the capacity of other LAMIC enhancing South-South partnerships and networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Razzouk, Denise & Sharan, Pratap & Gallo, Carla & Gureje, Oye & Lamberte, Exaltacion E. & de Jesus Mari, Jair & Mazzotti, Guido & Patel, Vikram & Swartz, Leslie & Olifson, Sylvie & Levav, Itzhak & de , 2010. "Scarcity and inequity of mental health research resources in low-and-middle income countries: A global survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 211-220, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:94:y:2010:i:3:p:211-220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(09)00242-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nchinda, Thomas C., 2002. "Research capacity strengthening in the South," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 1699-1711, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brill, Gregg & Anderson, Pippin & O'Farrell, Patrick, 2017. "Urban national parks in the global South: Linking management perceptions, policies and practices to water-related ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 185-195.
    2. D'Souza, Carol & Sadana, Ritu, 2006. "Why do case studies on national health research systems matter? Identifying common challenges in low- and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 2072-2078, April.
    3. Cash-Gibson, Lucinda & Martinez-Herrera, Eliana & Benach, Joan, 2021. "What key conditions and mechanisms generate health inequalities research in different contexts? Study protocol for two realist explanatory case studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Cruz, Regina C. & Person, Sharina D. & Bittencourt, Lorna & Efing, Ana C. & Scarinci, Isabel C., 2018. "Development and evaluation of a capacity building program in gender-relevant tobacco control research: A Brazilian experience," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-6.
    5. Jin, Ruining & Hoang, Giang & Nguyen, Thi-Phuong & Nguyen, Phuong-Tri & Le, Tam-Tri & La, Viet-Phuong & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2022. "An analytical framework-based pedagogical method for scholarly community coaching: A proof of concept," OSF Preprints qabhj, Center for Open Science.
    6. Watson, Sharon, 2022. "‘Don't cross the line, you're a researcher and not an educator’: Incorporating indigenous researchers' moral perspectives to improve ethical protocols in health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    7. Hamel, Nadia & Schrecker, Ted, 2011. "Unpacking capacity to utilize research: A tale of the Burkina Faso public health association," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 31-38, January.
    8. Lucinda Cash-Gibson & Diego F Rojas-Gualdrón & Juan M Pericàs & Joan Benach, 2018. "Inequalities in global health inequalities research: A 50-year bibliometric analysis (1966-2015)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Velho, Lea, 2002. "Research Capacity Building in Nicaragua: From Partnership with Sweden to Ownership and Social Accountability," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2002-09, United Nations University - INTECH.
    10. Williams, Christopher, 2021. "Global human burden and official development assistance in health R&D: The role of medical absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    11. Wight, Daniel, 2008. "Most of our social scientists are not institution based... they are there for hire--Research consultancies and social science capacity for health research in East Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 110-116, January.
    12. Hugo Confraria & Manuel Mira Godinho, 2015. "The impact of African science: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1241-1268, February.
    13. Rossello, Giulia & Cowan, Robin & Mairesse, Jacques, 2020. "Ph.D. research output in STEM: the role of gender and race in supervision," MERIT Working Papers 2020-021, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    14. Zahed Bigdeli & Morteza Kokabi & Gholam Reza Rajabi & Ali Gazni, 2013. "Patterns of authors’ information scattering: towards a causal explanation of information scattering from a scholarly information-seeking behavior perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 103-131, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:94:y:2010:i:3:p:211-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.