Aim To investigate the perceptions, concerns and attitudes of decision-makers regarding access to high cost medicines (HCMs) in public hospitals.Methods In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 decisions-makers (executive directors of hospitals, area health service managers, directors of hospital pharmacy departments and senior medical doctors) in a Sydney Area Health Service. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed and analysed using a modified grounded theory approach.Results Decision-makers perceived health care system funding models as obstacles to equity of access to HCMs. They were concerned that there were inequities in decisions for individual patients according to public or private sector status. A major concern for respondents was the lack of consistency in decision-making about funding for HCMs. Respondents described that besides safety, efficacy, effectiveness and cost, ethical principles should be borne in mind when deciding whether a HCM should be available in a public hospital. Most wanted a consistent, transparent, accountable, evidence-based decision-making process.Conclusions The results of this study suggest that decision-makers were concerned about the equity of access to HCMs in public hospitals and wanted an explicit, systematic process to allocate resources to HCMs.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Health Policy.
Volume (Year): 92 (2009) Issue (Month): 1 (September) Pages: 27-34 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF