IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v115y2014i1p68-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy analysis: Palliative care in Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • May, Peter
  • Hynes, Geralyn
  • McCallion, Philip
  • Payne, Sheila
  • Larkin, Philip
  • McCarron, Mary

Abstract

Palliative care for patients with advanced illness is a subject of growing importance in health services, policy and research. In 2001 Ireland became one of the first nations to publish a dedicated national palliative care policy. This paper uses the ‘policy analysis triangle’ as a framework to examine what the policy entailed, where the key ideas originated, why the policy process was activated, who were the key actors, and what were the main consequences. Although palliative care provision expanded following publication, priorities that were unaddressed or not fully embraced on the national policy agenda are identified. The factors underlying areas of non-fulfilment of policy are then discussed. In particular, the analysis highlights that policy initiatives in a relatively new field of healthcare face a trade-off between ambition and feasibility. Key policy goals could not be realised given the large resource commitments required; the competition for resources from other, better-established healthcare sectors; and challenges in expanding workforce and capacity. Additionally, the inherently cross-sectoral nature of palliative care complicated the co-ordination of support for the policy. Policy initiatives in emerging fields such as palliative care should address carefully feasibility and support in their conception and implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • May, Peter & Hynes, Geralyn & McCallion, Philip & Payne, Sheila & Larkin, Philip & McCarron, Mary, 2014. "Policy analysis: Palliative care in Ireland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 68-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:115:y:2014:i:1:p:68-74
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851013002054
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wren, Maev-Ann, 2004. "Health Spending and the Black Hole," Quarterly Economic Commentary: Special Articles, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), vol. 2004(3-Autumn), pages 1-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelly, Niall & Garvey, John & Palcic, Dónal, 2016. "Health policy and the policymaking system: A case study of primary care in Ireland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(8), pages 913-919.
    2. Bridget Johnston & Philip Larkin & Michael Connolly & Catriona Barry & Melanie Narayanasamy & Ulrika Östlund & Sonja McIlfatrick, 2015. "Dignity‐conserving care in palliative care settings: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1743-1772, July.
    3. Tamara Rodríguez Quintana & Viviana Dávalos-Batallas & Ana-Magdalena Vargas-Martínez & Lucelly López & Patricia Bonilla-Sierra & María-de-las-Mercedes Lomas-Campos & Fatima Leon-Larios, 2021. "Implementation and Knowledge of the Clinical Practice Guide for Palliative Care in the Ecuadorian Primary Care Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Roger Yat-Nork Chung & Dong Dong & Nancy Nam Sze Chau & Patsy Yuen-Kwan Chau & Eng Kiong Yeoh & Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, 2020. "Examining the Gaps and Issues of End-of-Life Care among Older Population through the Lens of Socioecological Model—A Multi-Method Qualitative Study of Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Sánchez-Cárdenas, Miguel Antonio & Morales, Juan Esteban Correa & Sánchez-Florez, Juan Camilo, 2022. "Inclusion of essential components of the World Health Organization palliative care development model in national palliative care plans: A documentary analysis in 31 countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(11), pages 1144-1150.
    6. Helen Y. L. Chan & Diana T. F. Lee & Jean Woo, 2019. "Diagnosing Gaps in the Development of Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Qualitative Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Whitelaw, Sandy & Bell, Anthony & Clark, David, 2022. "The expression of ‘policy’ in palliative care: A critical review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 889-898.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miriam M. Wiley, 2005. "The Irish health system: developments in strategy, structure, funding and delivery since 1980," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(S1), pages 169-186, September.
    2. repec:esr:chaptr:jacb200752 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Callan, Tim & Nolan, Brian, 2004. "Relative Income Poverty: Learning from the Best-Performing Countries," Papers BP2005/2, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    4. Garrett, Shane & Mathieu, Catherine & Nolan, Anne & Nolan, Brian & Sterdyniak, Henri, 2004. "Budget Perspectives 2005," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BMI176 edited by Callan, Tim & Doris, Aedin & McCoy, Daniel, June.
    5. Nolan, Anne & Nolan, Brian, 2004. "Ireland's Health Care System: Some Issues and Challenges," Papers BP2005/3, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    6. James F. O’Mahony, 2021. "Revision of Ireland’s Cost-Effectiveness Threshold: New State-Industry Drug Pricing Deal Should Adequately Reflect Opportunity Costs," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 339-348, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:115:y:2014:i:1:p:68-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.