IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v7y2005i3p345-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chain of custody certification: an assessment of the North American solid wood sector

Author

Listed:
  • Vidal, Natalia
  • Kozak, Robert
  • Cohen, David

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Vidal, Natalia & Kozak, Robert & Cohen, David, 2005. "Chain of custody certification: an assessment of the North American solid wood sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 345-355, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:7:y:2005:i:3:p:345-355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(03)00071-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Owari, Toshiaki & Juslin, Heikki & Rummukainen, Arto & Yoshimura, Tetsuhiko, 2006. "Strategies, functions and benefits of forest certification in wood products marketing: Perspectives of Finnish suppliers," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 380-391, December.
    2. Jakub Michal & David Březina & Dalibor Šafařík & Václav Kupčák & Andrea Sujová & Jitka Fialová, 2019. "Analysis of Socioeconomic Impacts of the FSC and PEFC Certification Systems on Business Entities and Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Yanli Li & Lan Gao, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility of Forestry Companies in China: An Analysis of Contents, Levels, Strategies, and Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Xinfei Li & Baodong Cheng & Heng Xu, 2021. "Time-Based Corporate-Social-Responsibility Evaluation Model Taking Chinese Listed Forestry Companies as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Martire, Salvatore & Castellani, Valentina & Sala, Serenella, 2015. "Carrying capacity assessment of forest resources: Enhancing environmental sustainability in energy production at local scale," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 11-20.
    6. Zubizarreta, Mikel & Arana-Landín, Germán & Wolff, Sarah & Egiluz, Ziortza, 2023. "Assessing the economic impacts of forest certification in Spain: A longitudinal study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    7. Blackman, Allen & Rivera, Jorge, 2010. "The Evidence Base for Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of “Sustainable†Certification," RFF Working Paper Series dp-10-10-efd, Resources for the Future.
    8. Blackman, Allen & Rivera, Jorge, 2010. "The Evidence Base for Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of “Sustainable” Certification," RFF Working Paper Series dp-10-17, Resources for the Future.
    9. Hubert Paluš & Ján Parobek & Roman Dudík & Mikuláš Šupín, 2017. "Assessment of Chain-of-Custody Certification in the Czech and Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Li, N. & Toppinen, A., 2011. "Corporate responsibility and sustainable competitive advantage in forest-based industry: Complementary or conflicting goals?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 113-123.
    11. Tikina, Anna & Kozak, Robert & Larson, Bruce, 2008. "What factors influence obtaining forest certification in the U.S. Pacific Northwest," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 240-247, February.
    12. Ahmet Tolunay & Türkay Türkoğlu, 2014. "Perspectives and Attitudes of Forest Products Industry Companies on the Chain of Custody Certification: A Case Study From Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Hermudananto, & Romero, Claudia & Ruslandi, & Putz, Francis E., 2018. "Analysis of corrective action requests from Forest Stewardship Council audits of natural forest management in Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 28-37.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:7:y:2005:i:3:p:345-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.