IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v2y2001i3-4p213-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic consequences of sustainable forest management regimes at non-industrial forest owner level in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Eid, Tron
  • Hoen, Hans Fredrik
  • Okseter, Petter

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Eid, Tron & Hoen, Hans Fredrik & Okseter, Petter, 2001. "Economic consequences of sustainable forest management regimes at non-industrial forest owner level in Norway," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3-4), pages 213-228, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:2:y:2001:i:3-4:p:213-228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(00)00038-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finn Førsund & Eric NÆvdal, 1998. "Efficiency Gains Under Exchange-Rate Emission Trading," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(4), pages 403-423, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eid, Tron & Fredrik Hoen, Hans & Okseter, Petter, 2002. "Timber production possibilities of the Norwegian forest area and measures for a sustainable forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 187-200, July.
    2. Zhou, Wenchao & Gong, Peichen, 2004. "Economic effects of environmental concerns in forest management: an analysis of the cost of achieving environmental goals," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 97-113, September.
    3. Hansmann, Ralf & Koellner, Thomas & Scholz, Roland W., 2006. "Influence of consumers' socioecological and economic orientations on preferences for wood products with sustainability labels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 239-250, April.
    4. Bergseng, Even & Ask, Jon Andreas & Framstad, Erik & Gobakken, Terje & Solberg, Birger & Hoen, Hans Fredrik, 2012. "Biodiversity protection and economics in long term boreal forest management — A detailed case for the valuation of protection measures," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 12-21.
    5. Gregory, S. Amacher & Christine Conway, M. & Sullivan, Jay & Gregory, S. Amacher, 2003. "Econometric analyses of nonindustrial forest landowners: Is there anything left to study?," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 137-164.
    6. Hoen, Hans Fredrik & Eid, Tron & Okseter, Petter, 2006. "Efficiency gains of cooperation between properties under varying target levels of old forest area coverage," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 135-148, March.
    7. Kärkkäinen, Leena & Haakana, Helena & Hirvelä, Hannu & Packalen, Tuula, 2019. "Using a decision support system to study impacts of land use policies on wood procurement possibilities of the sawmill industry – A case study at regional and municipal levels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 136-146.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao-Ning Liao, 2009. "Technology adoption decisions under a mixed regulatory system of tradable permits and air pollution fees for the control of Total Suspended Particulates in Taiwan," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 135-153, April.
    2. Gren, Ing-Marie & Carlsson, Mattias & Elofsson, Katarina & Munnich, Miriam, 2012. "Stochastic carbon sinks for combating carbon dioxide emissions in the EU," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1523-1531.
    3. Førsund, Finn R & Wolfgang, Ove, 2001. "The Compensation Mechanism in the RAINS Model: The Norwegian Targets for Acidification," Memorandum 34/2001, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    4. Simon Quemin & Christian Perthuis, 2019. "Transitional Restricted Linkage Between Emissions Trading Schemes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 1-32, September.
    5. Hung, Ming-Feng & Shaw, Daigee, 2005. "A trading-ratio system for trading water pollution discharge permits," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 83-102, January.
    6. Werner Antweiler, 2017. "Emission trading for air pollution hot spots: getting the permit market right," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(1), pages 35-58, January.
    7. Finus, Michael & Tjotta, Sigve, 2003. "The Oslo Protocol on sulfur reduction: the great leap forward?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(9-10), pages 2031-2048, September.
    8. Shen, Jun & Tang, Pengcheng & Zeng, Hao & Cheng, Jinhua & Liu, Xiuli, 2023. "Does emission trading system reduce mining cities’ pollution emissions? A quasi-natural experiment based on Chinese prefecture-level cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. F.R. Forsund, 2000. "An Economic Interpretation of the Compensation Mechanism in the RAINS Model," Working Papers ir00036, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    10. Marianne Keudel, 2006. "Water Quality Trading: Theoretical and Practical Approaches," IWP Discussion Paper Series 01/2006, Institute for Economic Policy, Cologne, Germany.
    11. Krysiak, Frank C. & Schweitzer, Patrick, 2010. "The optimal size of a permit market," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 133-143, September.
    12. Hoen, Hans Fredrik & Eid, Tron & Okseter, Petter, 2006. "Efficiency gains of cooperation between properties under varying target levels of old forest area coverage," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 135-148, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:2:y:2001:i:3-4:p:213-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.