IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v25y2012icp123-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students' views on forestry education: A cross-national comparison across three universities in Brazil, China and Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Arevalo, Javier
  • Mola-Yudego, Blas
  • Pelkonen, Paavo
  • Qu, Mei

Abstract

Our cross-national study examined the views of forestry students from Brazil, China and Finland on the highly debated issue of forestry education. Altogether, views from 584 Bachelor students from three programmes in the three countries were collected. Students' perceptions of importance of subject-specific and generic competencies and experiences, preferred area of work, and willingness to do a Master's degree were asked through a questionnaire in the respective national language. Quantitative analyses included comparisons across universities and study years, as well as influence of gender, grades, and satisfaction. Great similarities across the countries regarding the students' views on subject-specific competencies and experiences, as well as on the preferred areas of work were found. The students highly valued field experiences as well as areas such as environmental protection. Upon graduation a majority wished to work in the management of public forests, followed by industries in the case of Brazil and Finland and research in the case of China. Changes across the study years, such as the increasing importance given to oral and writing skills by students of later years, were observed. These and other results and their implications are discussed in consideration of cultural, curricular and institutional factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Arevalo, Javier & Mola-Yudego, Blas & Pelkonen, Paavo & Qu, Mei, 2012. "Students' views on forestry education: A cross-national comparison across three universities in Brazil, China and Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 123-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:25:y:2012:i:c:p:123-131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.08.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993411200202X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.08.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liz Farleidy Villarraga-Flórez & Sandra Rodríguez-Piñeros & Oscar Geovani Martínez-Cortés, 2015. "Social Science in Forestry Curricula: A Case Study of Colombia Forestry Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Ameyaw, Joana & Arts, Bas & Wals, Arjen, 2016. "Challenges to responsible forest governance in Ghana and its implications for professional education," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 78-87.
    3. Stephan Hoffmann & Dirk Jaeger & Wu Shuirong, 2018. "Adapting Chinese Forest Operations to Socio-Economic Developments: What is the Potential of Plantations for Strengthening Domestic Wood Supply?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:25:y:2012:i:c:p:123-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.